CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) Fold
MCC 0.649 > 0.604
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.617 ± 0.295 > 0.604 ± 0.300
Sensitivity 0.591 < 0.615
Positive Predictive Value 0.724 > 0.604
Total TP 123 < 128
Total TN 13762 > 13720
Total FP 50 < 99
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 27
Total FP INCONS 35 < 57
Total FP COMP 3 < 15
Total FN 85 > 80
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Fold).

  2. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Fold).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Fold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 123
Total TN 13762
Total FP 50
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 85
Total Scores
MCC 0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.617 ± 0.295
Sensitivity 0.591
Positive Predictive Value 0.724
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 340 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 2 10 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.66 0.68 19 1505 9 4 5 0 10
3W3S_B 0.92 0.88 0.97 29 1959 2 0 1 1 4
3ZEX_C 0.50 0.45 0.57 13 5351 11 3 7 1 16
4AOB_A 0.73 0.66 0.83 19 1414 5 1 3 1 10
4FRN_A 0.27 0.21 0.35 6 1831 11 2 9 0 22

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 128
Total TN 13720
Total FP 99
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 57
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 80
Total Scores
MCC 0.604
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.604 ± 0.300
Sensitivity 0.615
Positive Predictive Value 0.604
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3W3S_B 0.94 0.91 0.97 30 1958 2 0 1 1 3
3ZEX_C 0.28 0.34 0.23 10 5330 46 9 25 12 19
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4FRN_A 0.46 0.46 0.46 13 1820 15 7 8 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.