CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of HotKnots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & HotKnots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) HotKnots
MCC 0.649 > 0.581
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.617 ± 0.295 < 0.637 ± 0.253
Sensitivity 0.591 < 0.596
Positive Predictive Value 0.724 > 0.579
Total TP 123 < 124
Total TN 13762 > 13718
Total FP 50 < 93
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 25
Total FP INCONS 35 < 65
Total FP COMP 3 = 3
Total FN 85 > 84
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and HotKnots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and HotKnots).

  2. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and HotKnots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and HotKnots).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and HotKnots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and HotKnots).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and HotKnots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and HotKnots).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 123
Total TN 13762
Total FP 50
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 85
Total Scores
MCC 0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.617 ± 0.295
Sensitivity 0.591
Positive Predictive Value 0.724
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 340 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 2 10 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.66 0.68 19 1505 9 4 5 0 10
3W3S_B 0.92 0.88 0.97 29 1959 2 0 1 1 4
3ZEX_C 0.50 0.45 0.57 13 5351 11 3 7 1 16
4AOB_A 0.73 0.66 0.83 19 1414 5 1 3 1 10
4FRN_A 0.27 0.21 0.35 6 1831 11 2 9 0 22

^top



Performance of HotKnots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 124
Total TN 13718
Total FP 93
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 65
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 84
Total Scores
MCC 0.581
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.637 ± 0.253
Sensitivity 0.596
Positive Predictive Value 0.579
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 0 5 0 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3W3S_B 0.60 0.61 0.61 20 1956 14 4 9 1 13
3ZEX_C -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5328 46 11 35 0 29
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4FRN_A 0.59 0.57 0.62 16 1822 10 2 8 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.