CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) MCFold
MCC 0.574 > 0.476
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.545 ± 0.313 > 0.505 ± 0.283
Sensitivity 0.524 > 0.508
Positive Predictive Value 0.638 > 0.459
Total TP 97 > 94
Total TN 14178 > 14125
Total FP 56 < 130
Total FP CONTRA 19 < 21
Total FP INCONS 36 < 90
Total FP COMP 1 < 19
Total FN 88 < 91
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and MCFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 97
Total TN 14178
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 36
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 88
Total Scores
MCC 0.574
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.545 ± 0.313
Sensitivity 0.524
Positive Predictive Value 0.638
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 340 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 2 10 0 18
3J3E_8 0.19 0.20 0.19 3 2726 13 8 5 0 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.66 0.68 19 1505 9 4 5 0 10
3ZEX_C 0.50 0.45 0.57 13 5351 11 3 7 1 16
4FRN_A 0.27 0.21 0.35 6 1831 11 2 9 0 22
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 94
Total TN 14125
Total FP 130
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 90
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 91
Total Scores
MCC 0.476
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.505 ± 0.283
Sensitivity 0.508
Positive Predictive Value 0.459
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 511 10 0 9 1 10
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.12 3 2716 36 11 12 13 12
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.27 10 5337 28 6 21 1 19
4FRN_A 0.09 0.11 0.10 3 1818 28 2 25 1 25
4JF2_A 0.74 0.75 0.75 18 1058 7 1 5 1 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.