CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) UNAFold
MCC 0.649 > 0.578
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.617 ± 0.295 > 0.580 ± 0.280
Sensitivity 0.591 > 0.577
Positive Predictive Value 0.724 > 0.591
Total TP 123 > 120
Total TN 13762 > 13729
Total FP 50 < 101
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 22
Total FP INCONS 35 < 61
Total FP COMP 3 < 18
Total FN 85 < 88
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and UNAFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 123
Total TN 13762
Total FP 50
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 85
Total Scores
MCC 0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.617 ± 0.295
Sensitivity 0.591
Positive Predictive Value 0.724
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 340 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 2 10 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.66 0.68 19 1505 9 4 5 0 10
3W3S_B 0.92 0.88 0.97 29 1959 2 0 1 1 4
3ZEX_C 0.50 0.45 0.57 13 5351 11 3 7 1 16
4AOB_A 0.73 0.66 0.83 19 1414 5 1 3 1 10
4FRN_A 0.27 0.21 0.35 6 1831 11 2 9 0 22

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 120
Total TN 13729
Total FP 101
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 61
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 88
Total Scores
MCC 0.578
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.580 ± 0.280
Sensitivity 0.577
Positive Predictive Value 0.591
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3W3S_B 0.61 0.61 0.63 20 1957 13 4 8 1 13
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.26 10 5336 43 5 23 15 19
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4FRN_A 0.48 0.46 0.52 13 1823 12 2 10 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.