CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) CentroidFold
MCC 0.702 > 0.690
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.691 ± 0.066 > 0.686 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.610 < 0.689
Positive Predictive Value 0.814 > 0.698
Total TP 621 < 701
Total TN 107182 > 106940
Total FP 248 < 454
Total FP CONTRA 32 < 106
Total FP INCONS 110 < 198
Total FP COMP 106 < 150
Total FN 397 > 317
P-value 2.12176083234e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and CentroidFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and CentroidFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 621
Total TN 107182
Total FP 248
Total FP CONTRA 32
Total FP INCONS 110
Total FP COMP 106
Total FN 397
Total Scores
MCC 0.702
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.691 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.610
Positive Predictive Value 0.814
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.51 0.50 0.56 9 341 8 0 7 1 9
2WRQ_Y 0.63 0.67 0.60 6 1142 13 1 3 9 3
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 3 0 0 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.86 0.90 18 1109 3 0 2 1 3
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 0 0 0 0 28
3A2K_C 0.88 0.86 0.90 19 1087 2 0 2 0 3
3AMU_B 0.89 0.89 0.89 17 1138 4 0 2 2 2
3GX2_A 0.73 0.54 1.00 15 1434 1 0 0 1 13
3IVN_B 0.80 0.65 1.00 15 888 0 0 0 0 8
3IZ4_A 0.46 0.33 0.66 31 25489 22 3 13 6 64
3IZF_C 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2609 5 0 2 3 6
3J20_0 0.65 0.62 0.68 13 1200 6 1 5 0 8
3J20_1 0.69 0.60 0.80 12 1097 4 0 3 1 8
3J2L_3 0.84 0.74 0.96 25 2994 4 0 1 3 9
3J3D_C 0.84 0.84 0.84 16 949 3 3 0 0 3
3J3E_8 0.35 0.33 0.38 5 2729 13 2 6 5 10
3J3E_7 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2709 4 0 0 4 2
3J3F_8 0.54 0.53 0.56 10 4743 13 2 6 5 9
3J3F_7 0.83 0.69 1.00 25 2909 1 0 0 1 11
3J3V_B 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2635 2 0 0 2 6
3JYV_7 0.84 0.80 0.89 16 1093 4 0 2 2 4
3JYX_3 0.76 0.73 0.79 11 2364 14 0 3 11 4
3JYX_4 0.72 0.75 0.69 9 4743 15 3 1 11 3
3LA5_A 0.80 0.64 1.00 16 938 0 0 0 0 9
3NPB_A 0.65 0.43 1.00 16 2262 2 0 0 2 21
3O58_3 0.37 0.32 0.44 7 4748 13 4 5 4 15
3O58_2 1.00 1.00 1.00 31 2723 2 0 0 2 0
3PDR_A 0.84 0.76 0.93 38 4799 3 1 2 0 12
3RKF_A 0.81 0.67 1.00 16 850 0 0 0 0 8
3SD1_A 0.82 0.83 0.83 24 1504 5 4 1 0 5
3ZEX_D 0.90 0.86 0.94 30 2764 5 0 2 3 5
3ZEX_C 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 5351 16 2 10 4 18
3ZND_W 0.62 0.63 0.63 5 1183 15 0 3 12 3
4A1C_3 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 2738 4 0 3 1 15
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.20 5 4491 24 5 15 4 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 22 1415 3 0 0 3 7
4ENB_A 0.51 0.27 1.00 4 468 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.19 0.17 0.25 4 1186 12 1 11 0 20

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 701
Total TN 106940
Total FP 454
Total FP CONTRA 106
Total FP INCONS 198
Total FP COMP 150
Total FN 317
Total Scores
MCC 0.690
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.686 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.689
Positive Predictive Value 0.698
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 13 0 0 13 0
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 27 0 6 21 3
2XQD_Y 0.83 0.81 0.85 17 1109 4 0 3 1 4
2XXA_G 0.13 0.11 0.17 4 2021 21 2 18 1 31
3A2K_C 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1082 14 3 11 0 10
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3GX2_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 25 1424 1 0 0 1 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.60 0.57 0.64 54 25451 38 16 15 7 41
3IZF_C 0.89 0.91 0.86 32 2603 11 0 5 6 3
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 2 0 0 2 0
3J2L_3 0.74 0.76 0.72 26 2984 15 1 9 5 8
3J3D_C 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 946 7 3 4 0 4
3J3E_8 0.12 0.13 0.13 2 2726 22 4 10 8 13
3J3E_7 0.61 0.59 0.65 20 2710 13 2 9 2 14
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.28 9 4729 37 12 11 14 10
3J3F_7 0.84 0.86 0.82 31 2896 9 1 6 2 5
3J3V_B 0.72 0.74 0.71 20 2628 16 1 7 8 7
3JYV_7 0.92 0.85 1.00 17 1094 2 0 0 2 3
3JYX_3 0.35 0.47 0.27 7 2352 21 14 5 2 8
3JYX_4 0.41 0.58 0.29 7 4732 25 11 6 8 5
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.87 0.84 0.91 31 2244 8 1 2 5 6
3O58_3 0.44 0.41 0.47 9 4745 11 1 9 1 13
3O58_2 0.95 0.94 0.97 29 2724 7 0 1 6 2
3PDR_A 0.88 0.86 0.90 43 4792 7 2 3 2 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 1505 8 4 4 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.86 0.91 30 2763 8 0 3 5 5
3ZEX_C 0.48 0.34 0.67 10 5359 6 1 4 1 19
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 25 9 7 9 5
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 8 0 6 2 8
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.19 5 4490 29 9 12 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.