CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.697 > 0.230
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.686 ± 0.066 > 0.177 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.604 > 0.114
Positive Predictive Value 0.810 > 0.479
Total TP 605 > 114
Total TN 104716 < 105225
Total FP 246 > 138
Total FP CONTRA 32 > 22
Total FP INCONS 110 > 102
Total FP COMP 104 > 14
Total FN 396 < 887
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 605
Total TN 104716
Total FP 246
Total FP CONTRA 32
Total FP INCONS 110
Total FP COMP 104
Total FN 396
Total Scores
MCC 0.697
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.686 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.604
Positive Predictive Value 0.810
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 169 0 0 0 0 5
2L94_A 0.51 0.50 0.56 9 341 8 0 7 1 9
2WRQ_Y 0.63 0.67 0.60 6 1142 13 1 3 9 3
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 3 0 0 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.86 0.90 18 1109 3 0 2 1 3
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 0 0 0 0 28
3A2K_C 0.88 0.86 0.90 19 1087 2 0 2 0 3
3AMU_B 0.89 0.89 0.89 17 1138 4 0 2 2 2
3GX2_A 0.73 0.54 1.00 15 1434 1 0 0 1 13
3IVN_B 0.80 0.65 1.00 15 888 0 0 0 0 8
3IZ4_A 0.46 0.33 0.66 31 25489 22 3 13 6 64
3IZF_C 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2609 5 0 2 3 6
3J20_0 0.65 0.62 0.68 13 1200 6 1 5 0 8
3J20_1 0.69 0.60 0.80 12 1097 4 0 3 1 8
3J2L_3 0.84 0.74 0.96 25 2994 4 0 1 3 9
3J3D_C 0.84 0.84 0.84 16 949 3 3 0 0 3
3J3E_7 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2709 4 0 0 4 2
3J3E_8 0.35 0.33 0.38 5 2729 13 2 6 5 10
3J3F_7 0.83 0.69 1.00 25 2909 1 0 0 1 11
3J3F_8 0.54 0.53 0.56 10 4743 13 2 6 5 9
3JYV_7 0.84 0.80 0.89 16 1093 4 0 2 2 4
3JYX_4 0.72 0.75 0.69 9 4743 15 3 1 11 3
3JYX_3 0.76 0.73 0.79 11 2364 14 0 3 11 4
3LA5_A 0.80 0.64 1.00 16 938 0 0 0 0 9
3NPB_A 0.65 0.43 1.00 16 2262 2 0 0 2 21
3O58_3 0.37 0.32 0.44 7 4748 13 4 5 4 15
3O58_2 1.00 1.00 1.00 31 2723 2 0 0 2 0
3PDR_A 0.84 0.76 0.93 38 4799 3 1 2 0 12
3RKF_A 0.81 0.67 1.00 16 850 0 0 0 0 8
3SD1_A 0.82 0.83 0.83 24 1504 5 4 1 0 5
3ZEX_D 0.90 0.86 0.94 30 2764 5 0 2 3 5
3ZEX_C 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 5351 16 2 10 4 18
3ZND_W 0.62 0.63 0.63 5 1183 15 0 3 12 3
4A1C_3 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 2738 4 0 3 1 15
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.20 5 4491 24 5 15 4 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 22 1415 3 0 0 3 7
4ENB_A 0.51 0.27 1.00 4 468 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.19 0.17 0.25 4 1186 12 1 11 0 20

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 114
Total TN 105225
Total FP 138
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 102
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 887
Total Scores
MCC 0.230
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.177 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.114
Positive Predictive Value 0.479
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 166 0 0 0 0 2
2L94_A 0.55 0.50 0.64 9 343 6 0 5 1 9
2WRQ_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1150 3 1 1 1 9
2XKV_B 0.38 0.36 0.40 4 1825 8 4 2 2 7
2XQD_Y -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 5 0 5 0 21
2XXA_G 0.37 0.20 0.70 7 2035 3 0 3 0 28
3A2K_C -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1106 2 0 2 0 22
3AMU_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1155 2 0 2 0 19
3GX2_A 0.42 0.21 0.86 6 1442 1 0 1 0 22
3IVN_B 0.81 0.70 0.94 16 886 1 1 0 0 7
3IZ4_A 0.26 0.11 0.63 10 25520 7 2 4 1 85
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2635 5 0 5 0 35
3J20_0 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1215 4 0 4 0 21
3J20_1 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1108 5 0 4 1 20
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3015 5 0 5 0 34
3J3D_C -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 964 4 1 3 0 19
3J3E_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2733 8 1 7 0 34
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2930 4 1 3 0 36
3J3F_8 0.19 0.11 0.33 2 4755 5 3 1 1 17
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1108 4 0 3 1 20
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4754 5 0 2 3 12
3JYX_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2373 5 1 4 0 15
3LA5_A 0.82 0.68 1.00 17 937 0 0 0 0 8
3NPB_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2274 4 0 4 0 37
3O58_3 0.28 0.14 0.60 3 4759 2 0 2 0 19
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2751 3 0 3 0 31
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4832 8 0 8 0 50
3RKF_A 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 847 1 1 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2794 2 0 2 0 35
3ZEX_C 0.13 0.07 0.25 2 5366 6 2 4 0 27
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1189 4 0 2 2 8
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2759 4 2 2 0 37
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4512 5 2 2 1 20
4AOB_A 0.42 0.21 0.86 6 1430 1 0 1 0 23
4ENB_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 467 2 0 2 0 12
4ENC_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 491 2 0 2 0 12
4FRG_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1200 2 0 2 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.