CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for NanoFolder & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric NanoFolder RDfolder
MCC 0.548 > 0.507
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.697 ± 0.192 > 0.647 ± 0.253
Sensitivity 0.613 > 0.470
Positive Predictive Value 0.512 < 0.572
Total TP 103 > 79
Total TN 6222 < 6285
Total FP 103 > 60
Total FP CONTRA 26 > 8
Total FP INCONS 72 > 51
Total FP COMP 5 > 1
Total FN 65 < 89
P-value 5.90637340822e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of NanoFolder and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for NanoFolder and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 103
Total TN 6222
Total FP 103
Total FP CONTRA 26
Total FP INCONS 72
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 65
Total Scores
MCC 0.548
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.697 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.613
Positive Predictive Value 0.512
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.54 0.61 0.50 11 506 11 1 10 0 7
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
3J16_L 0.43 0.52 0.37 11 1129 19 8 11 0 10
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.18 0.21 0.18 7 1949 34 2 31 1 26
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.39 0.41 0.39 12 1406 20 4 15 1 17
4ATO_G - 0.72 1.00 0.54 7 207 6 6 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.66 0.73 0.61 11 478 9 2 5 2 4
4HXH_A - 0.80 1.00 0.67 6 86 3 3 0 0 0

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 79
Total TN 6285
Total FP 60
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 89
Total Scores
MCC 0.507
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.647 ± 0.253
Sensitivity 0.470
Positive Predictive Value 0.572
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
3J16_L 0.26 0.24 0.31 5 1143 11 0 11 0 16
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.29 0.27 0.33 9 1962 18 2 16 0 24
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ATO_G - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 216 0 0 0 0 3
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.