Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of CentroidFold
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_2.0(20) & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_2.0(20) |
|
CentroidFold |
|---|
| MCC |
0.905 |
>
|
0.725 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.905
±
|
>
|
0.725
±
|
| Sensitivity |
0.889 |
>
|
0.741 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.923 |
>
|
0.714 |
| Total TP |
24 |
>
|
20 |
| Total TN |
2630 |
>
|
2628 |
| Total FP |
11 |
<
|
16 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
0 |
<
|
1 |
| Total FP INCONS |
2 |
<
|
7 |
| Total FP COMP |
9 |
>
|
8 |
| Total FN |
3 |
<
|
7 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_2.0(20) and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_2.0(20)
and CentroidFold).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_2.0(20) and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_2.0(20)
and CentroidFold).
Performance of PETfold_2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_2.0(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
24 |
| Total TN |
2630 |
| Total FP |
11 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
0 |
| Total FP INCONS |
2 |
| Total FP COMP |
9 |
| Total FN |
3 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.905 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.905
±
|
| Sensitivity |
0.889 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.923 |
| Nr of predictions |
1 |
Performance of CentroidFold
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
20 |
| Total TN |
2628 |
| Total FP |
16 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
1 |
| Total FP INCONS |
7 |
| Total FP COMP |
8 |
| Total FN |
7 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.725 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.725
±
|
| Sensitivity |
0.741 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.714 |
| Nr of predictions |
1 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
| 
