CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_2.0(20) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_2.0(20) Fold
MCC 0.905 > 0.735
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.905 ± > 0.735 ±
Sensitivity 0.889 > 0.778
Positive Predictive Value 0.923 > 0.700
Total TP 24 > 21
Total TN 2630 > 2626
Total FP 11 < 17
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 2
Total FP INCONS 2 < 7
Total FP COMP 9 > 8
Total FN 3 < 6
P-value 0.0

^top



Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_2.0(20) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_2.0(20) and Fold).

  2. Comparison of performance of PETfold_2.0(20) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_2.0(20) and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_2.0(20) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_2.0(20) and Fold).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_2.0(20) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_2.0(20) and Fold).

^top




Performance of PETfold_2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 24
Total TN 2630
Total FP 11
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 2
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 3
Total Scores
MCC 0.905
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.905 ±
Sensitivity 0.889
Positive Predictive Value 0.923
Nr of predictions 1

^top


2. Individual counts for PETfold_2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3V_B

5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...

0.90 0.89 0.92 24 2630 11 0 2 9 3

^top


Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 21
Total TN 2626
Total FP 17
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 7
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 6
Total Scores
MCC 0.735
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.735 ±
Sensitivity 0.778
Positive Predictive Value 0.700
Nr of predictions 1

^top


2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3V_B

5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...

0.74 0.78 0.70 21 2626 17 2 7 8 6

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Copyright© - Adam Mickiewicz University & IIMCB - All rights reserved