CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_2.0(20) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_2.0(20) NanoFolder
MCC 0.905 > 0.281
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.905 ± > 0.281 ±
Sensitivity 0.889 > 0.370
Positive Predictive Value 0.923 > 0.227
Total TP 24 > 10
Total TN 2630 > 2612
Total FP 11 < 38
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 13
Total FP INCONS 2 < 21
Total FP COMP 9 > 4
Total FN 3 < 17
P-value 0.0

^top



Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_2.0(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_2.0(20) and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of performance of PETfold_2.0(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_2.0(20) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_2.0(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_2.0(20) and NanoFolder).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_2.0(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_2.0(20) and NanoFolder).

^top




Performance of PETfold_2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 24
Total TN 2630
Total FP 11
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 2
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 3
Total Scores
MCC 0.905
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.905 ±
Sensitivity 0.889
Positive Predictive Value 0.923
Nr of predictions 1

^top


2. Individual counts for PETfold_2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3V_B

5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...

0.90 0.89 0.92 24 2630 11 0 2 9 3

^top


Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 10
Total TN 2612
Total FP 38
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 17
Total Scores
MCC 0.281
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.281 ±
Sensitivity 0.370
Positive Predictive Value 0.227
Nr of predictions 1

^top


2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3V_B

5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...

0.28 0.37 0.23 10 2612 38 13 21 4 17

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Copyright© - Adam Mickiewicz University & IIMCB - All rights reserved