Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of RNASampler(20)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_2.0(seed) & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_2.0(seed) |
|
RNASampler(20) |
|---|
| MCC |
0.905 |
>
|
0.881 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.905
±
|
>
|
0.881
±
|
| Sensitivity |
0.889 |
>
|
0.778 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.923 |
<
|
1.000 |
| Total TP |
24 |
>
|
21 |
| Total TN |
2630 |
<
|
2635 |
| Total FP |
14 |
>
|
4 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
0 |
=
|
0 |
| Total FP INCONS |
2 |
>
|
0 |
| Total FP COMP |
12 |
>
|
4 |
| Total FN |
3 |
<
|
6 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_2.0(seed) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_2.0(seed)
and RNASampler(20)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_2.0(seed) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_2.0(seed)
and RNASampler(20)).
Performance of PETfold_2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_2.0(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
24 |
| Total TN |
2630 |
| Total FP |
14 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
0 |
| Total FP INCONS |
2 |
| Total FP COMP |
12 |
| Total FN |
3 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.905 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.905
±
|
| Sensitivity |
0.889 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.923 |
| Nr of predictions |
1 |
Performance of RNASampler(20)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
21 |
| Total TN |
2635 |
| Total FP |
4 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
0 |
| Total FP INCONS |
0 |
| Total FP COMP |
4 |
| Total FN |
6 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.881 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.881
±
|
| Sensitivity |
0.778 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
1.000 |
| Nr of predictions |
1 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
| 
