Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of Sfold
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_2.0(seed) & Sfold [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
Metric |
PETfold_2.0(seed) |
|
Sfold |
MCC |
0.866 |
>
|
0.858 |
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.868
±
0.471
|
>
|
0.848
±
1.515
|
Sensitivity |
0.845 |
=
|
0.845 |
Positive Predictive Value |
0.891 |
>
|
0.875 |
Total TP |
49 |
=
|
49 |
Total TN |
4279 |
>
|
4278 |
Total FP |
19 |
>
|
11 |
Total FP CONTRA |
2 |
>
|
1 |
Total FP INCONS |
4 |
<
|
6 |
Total FP COMP |
13 |
>
|
4 |
Total FN |
9 |
=
|
9 |
P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_2.0(seed) and Sfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_2.0(seed)
and Sfold).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_2.0(seed) and Sfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_2.0(seed)
and Sfold).
Performance of PETfold_2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_2.0(seed)
Total Base Pair Counts |
Total TP |
49 |
Total TN |
4279 |
Total FP |
19 |
Total FP CONTRA |
2 |
Total FP INCONS |
4 |
Total FP COMP |
13 |
Total FN |
9 |
Total Scores |
MCC |
0.866 |
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.868
±
0.471
|
Sensitivity |
0.845 |
Positive Predictive Value |
0.891 |
Nr of predictions |
2 |
Performance of Sfold
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold
Total Base Pair Counts |
Total TP |
49 |
Total TN |
4278 |
Total FP |
11 |
Total FP CONTRA |
1 |
Total FP INCONS |
6 |
Total FP COMP |
4 |
Total FN |
9 |
Total Scores |
MCC |
0.858 |
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.848
±
1.515
|
Sensitivity |
0.845 |
Positive Predictive Value |
0.875 |
Nr of predictions |
2 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|