Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(20) |
|
CentroidHomfold‑LAST |
| MCC |
0.828 |
>
|
0.697 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.781
±
0.122
|
>
|
0.678
±
0.138
|
| Sensitivity |
0.814 |
>
|
0.706 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.847 |
>
|
0.694 |
| Total TP |
332 |
>
|
288 |
| Total TN |
36634 |
>
|
36611 |
| Total FP |
125 |
<
|
196 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
13 |
<
|
41 |
| Total FP INCONS |
47 |
<
|
86 |
| Total FP COMP |
65 |
<
|
69 |
| Total FN |
76 |
<
|
120 |
| P-value |
3.39090039918e-08 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
332 |
| Total TN |
36634 |
| Total FP |
125 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
13 |
| Total FP INCONS |
47 |
| Total FP COMP |
65 |
| Total FN |
76 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.828 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.781
±
0.122
|
| Sensitivity |
0.814 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.847 |
| Nr of predictions |
17 |
Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
288 |
| Total TN |
36611 |
| Total FP |
196 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
41 |
| Total FP INCONS |
86 |
| Total FP COMP |
69 |
| Total FN |
120 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.697 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.678
±
0.138
|
| Sensitivity |
0.706 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.694 |
| Nr of predictions |
17 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|