CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.828 > 0.697
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.781 ± 0.122 > 0.678 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.814 > 0.706
Positive Predictive Value 0.847 > 0.694
Total TP 332 > 288
Total TN 36634 > 36611
Total FP 125 < 196
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 41
Total FP INCONS 47 < 86
Total FP COMP 65 < 69
Total FN 76 < 120
P-value 3.39090039918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 332
Total TN 36634
Total FP 125
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 47
Total FP COMP 65
Total FN 76
Total Scores
MCC 0.828
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.781 ± 0.122
Sensitivity 0.814
Positive Predictive Value 0.847
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 4 0 0 4 2
3J3D_C 0.87 0.89 0.85 17 948 3 3 0 0 2
3J3E_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 7 2728 11 2 5 4 8
3J3E_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2707 7 0 2 5 2
3J3F_7 0.93 0.92 0.94 33 2899 6 0 2 4 3
3J3F_8 0.34 0.37 0.32 7 4739 24 5 10 9 12
3J3V_B 0.90 0.89 0.92 24 2630 11 0 2 9 3
3ZEX_D 0.93 0.91 0.94 32 2762 6 0 2 4 3
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_2 0.25 0.25 0.25 5 4496 25 2 13 10 15
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 1 0 0 1 0
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.68 0.53 0.89 8 463 1 0 1 0 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7
4FRG_B 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 1181 2 0 1 1 4

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 288
Total TN 36611
Total FP 196
Total FP CONTRA 41
Total FP INCONS 86
Total FP COMP 69
Total FN 120
Total Scores
MCC 0.697
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.678 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.706
Positive Predictive Value 0.694
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.41 0.52 0.34 11 1187 22 7 14 1 10
3J2L_3 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2986 8 0 2 6 2
3J3D_C 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 946 7 3 4 0 4
3J3E_8 0.07 0.07 0.09 1 2731 16 4 6 6 14
3J3E_7 0.85 0.85 0.85 29 2707 9 0 5 4 5
3J3F_7 0.79 0.81 0.78 29 2897 10 1 7 2 7
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.27 9 4728 36 11 13 12 10
3J3V_B 0.72 0.67 0.78 18 2633 11 1 4 6 9
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.83 0.91 29 2764 8 0 3 5 6
3ZND_W 0.75 0.75 0.75 6 1183 13 0 2 11 2
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 7 0 6 1 8
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.43 0.50 0.40 12 1172 18 6 12 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.