CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	PETfold_pre2.0(20)		Cylofold
MCC	0.882	>	0.728
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.841 ± 0.113	>	0.747 ± 0.148
Sensitivity	0.846	>	0.726
Positive Predictive Value	0.924	>	0.737
Total TP	170	>	146
Total TN	12761	>	12747
Total FP	37	<	69
Total FP CONTRA	1	<	19
Total FP INCONS	13	<	33
Total FP COMP	23	>	17
Total FN	31	<	55
P-value	0.0

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold).
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold).

^top

Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	170
Total TN	12761
Total FP	37
Total FP CONTRA	1
Total FP INCONS	13
Total FP COMP	23
Total FN	31

Total Scores
MCC	0.882
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.841 ± 0.113
Sensitivity	0.846
Positive Predictive Value	0.924
Nr of predictions	9

^top

2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	20	1092	1	0	0	1	0
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.95	0.95	20	1198	1	1	0	0	1
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.94	1.00	32	2988	4	0	0	4	2
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.91	0.94	32	2762	6	0	2	4	3
3ZND_W	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.75	0.60	6	1181	15	0	4	11	2
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.87	0.83	0.92	24	1411	4	0	2	2	5
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.53	0.89	8	463	1	0	1	0	7
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.53	0.73	8	485	3	0	3	0	7
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.83	0.95	20	1181	2	0	1	1	4

^top

Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	146
Total TN	12747
Total FP	69
Total FP CONTRA	19
Total FP INCONS	33
Total FP COMP	17
Total FN	55

Total Scores
MCC	0.728
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.747 ± 0.148
Sensitivity	0.726
Positive Predictive Value	0.737
Nr of predictions	9

^top

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.75	0.68	15	1090	8	2	5	1	5
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.76	0.73	16	1197	7	3	3	1	5
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.68	0.74	23	2989	11	0	8	3	11
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.69	0.71	24	2762	11	5	5	1	11
3ZND_W	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.75	0.43	6	1177	18	5	3	10	2
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.38	0.48	11	1414	13	3	9	1	18
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	15	457	0	0	0	0	0
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.97	1.00	0.94	15	480	1	1	0	0	0
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.88	1.00	21	1181	0	0	0	0	3

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]