CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	PETfold_pre2.0(20)		Fold
MCC	0.793	>	0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.752 ± 0.129	>	0.522 ± 0.148
Sensitivity	0.776	>	0.606
Positive Predictive Value	0.815	>	0.534
Total TP	339	>	265
Total TN	41984	>	41904
Total FP	145	<	324
Total FP CONTRA	14	<	71
Total FP INCONS	63	<	160
Total FP COMP	68	<	93
Total FN	98	<	172
P-value	3.05041766982e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Fold).
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Fold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Fold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Fold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Fold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Fold).

^top

Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	339
Total TN	41984
Total FP	145
Total FP CONTRA	14
Total FP INCONS	63
Total FP COMP	68
Total FN	98

Total Scores
MCC	0.793
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.752 ± 0.129
Sensitivity	0.776
Positive Predictive Value	0.815
Nr of predictions	18

^top

2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	20	1092	1	0	0	1	0
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.95	0.95	20	1198	1	1	0	0	1
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.94	1.00	32	2988	4	0	0	4	2
3J3D_C	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.87	0.89	0.85	17	948	3	3	0	0	2
3J3E_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.47	0.50	7	2728	11	2	5	4	8
3J3E_7	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.94	0.94	32	2707	7	0	2	5	2
3J3F_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.34	0.37	0.32	7	4739	24	5	10	9	12
3J3F_7	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.92	0.94	33	2899	6	0	2	4	3
3J3V_B	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.90	0.89	0.92	24	2630	11	0	2	9	3
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.91	0.94	32	2762	6	0	2	4	3
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.26	0.24	0.29	7	5350	20	1	16	3	22
3ZND_W	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.75	0.60	6	1181	15	0	4	11	2
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.25	0.25	0.25	5	4496	25	2	13	10	15
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	37	2726	1	0	0	1	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.87	0.83	0.92	24	1411	4	0	2	2	5
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.53	0.89	8	463	1	0	1	0	7
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.53	0.73	8	485	3	0	3	0	7
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.83	0.95	20	1181	2	0	1	1	4

^top

Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	265
Total TN	41904
Total FP	324
Total FP CONTRA	71
Total FP INCONS	160
Total FP COMP	93
Total FN	172

Total Scores
MCC	0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.522 ± 0.148
Sensitivity	0.606
Positive Predictive Value	0.534
Nr of predictions	18

^top

2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	20	1092	1	0	0	1	0
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.54	0.57	0.52	12	1196	12	3	8	1	9
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.80	0.82	0.78	28	2984	12	1	7	4	6
3J3D_C	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.47	0.53	0.43	10	945	13	5	8	0	9
3J3E_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	2719	34	5	18	11	15
3J3E_7	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.59	0.59	0.61	20	2708	15	2	11	2	14
3J3F_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.32	0.42	0.25	8	4729	41	12	12	17	11
3J3F_7	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.94	0.94	34	2898	4	1	1	2	2
3J3V_B	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.78	0.70	21	2626	17	2	7	8	6
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.90	0.86	0.94	30	2764	8	0	2	6	5
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.28	0.34	0.23	10	5330	46	9	25	12	19
3ZND_W	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.24	0.38	0.16	3	1172	25	9	7	9	5
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.19	0.25	0.15	5	4482	43	11	18	14	15
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.84	0.89	31	2728	7	0	4	3	6
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.60	0.59	0.63	17	1410	11	4	6	1	12
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.37	0.33	0.45	5	461	7	0	6	1	10
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.36	0.33	0.42	5	484	8	0	7	1	10
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.22	0.25	0.23	6	1176	20	7	13	0	18

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]