CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of HotKnots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & HotKnots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) HotKnots
MCC 0.793 > 0.588
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.752 ± 0.129 > 0.579 ± 0.158
Sensitivity 0.776 > 0.634
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.554
Total TP 339 > 277
Total TN 41984 > 41900
Total FP 145 < 311
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 66
Total FP INCONS 63 < 157
Total FP COMP 68 < 88
Total FN 98 < 160
P-value 2.57237423209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and HotKnots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and HotKnots).

  2. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and HotKnots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and HotKnots).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and HotKnots).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and HotKnots).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and HotKnots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and HotKnots).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and HotKnots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and HotKnots).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 339
Total TN 41984
Total FP 145
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 63
Total FP COMP 68
Total FN 98
Total Scores
MCC 0.793
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.752 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.776
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 4 0 0 4 2
3J3D_C 0.87 0.89 0.85 17 948 3 3 0 0 2
3J3E_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 7 2728 11 2 5 4 8
3J3E_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2707 7 0 2 5 2
3J3F_8 0.34 0.37 0.32 7 4739 24 5 10 9 12
3J3F_7 0.93 0.92 0.94 33 2899 6 0 2 4 3
3J3V_B 0.90 0.89 0.92 24 2630 11 0 2 9 3
3ZEX_D 0.93 0.91 0.94 32 2762 6 0 2 4 3
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.24 0.29 7 5350 20 1 16 3 22
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_2 0.25 0.25 0.25 5 4496 25 2 13 10 15
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 1 0 0 1 0
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.68 0.53 0.89 8 463 1 0 1 0 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7
4FRG_B 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 1181 2 0 1 1 4

^top



Performance of HotKnots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 277
Total TN 41900
Total FP 311
Total FP CONTRA 66
Total FP INCONS 157
Total FP COMP 88
Total FN 160
Total Scores
MCC 0.588
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.579 ± 0.158
Sensitivity 0.634
Positive Predictive Value 0.554
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 8 0 5 3 5
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 12 1 7 4 6
3J3D_C 0.33 0.37 0.32 7 946 15 3 12 0 12
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.12 3 2717 33 7 15 11 12
3J3E_7 0.80 0.79 0.82 27 2708 11 1 5 5 7
3J3F_8 0.33 0.42 0.26 8 4730 43 11 12 20 11
3J3F_7 0.86 0.86 0.86 31 2898 8 1 4 3 5
3J3V_B 0.75 0.74 0.77 20 2630 17 0 6 11 7
3ZEX_D 0.90 0.86 0.94 30 2764 6 0 2 4 5
3ZEX_C -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5328 46 11 35 0 29
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 24 9 7 8 5
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 12 16 14 15
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.