Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of MaxExpect
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & MaxExpect [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(20) |
|
MaxExpect |
| MCC |
0.793 |
>
|
0.592 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.752
±
0.129
|
>
|
0.553
±
0.127
|
| Sensitivity |
0.776 |
>
|
0.609 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.815 |
>
|
0.585 |
| Total TP |
339 |
>
|
266 |
| Total TN |
41984 |
>
|
41945 |
| Total FP |
145 |
<
|
281 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
14 |
<
|
57 |
| Total FP INCONS |
63 |
<
|
132 |
| Total FP COMP |
68 |
<
|
92 |
| Total FN |
98 |
<
|
171 |
| P-value |
2.39162260866e-08 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and MaxExpect. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and MaxExpect).
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and MaxExpect. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and MaxExpect).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and MaxExpect).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and MaxExpect).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and MaxExpect. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and MaxExpect).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and MaxExpect. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and MaxExpect).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
339 |
| Total TN |
41984 |
| Total FP |
145 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
14 |
| Total FP INCONS |
63 |
| Total FP COMP |
68 |
| Total FN |
98 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.793 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.752
±
0.129
|
| Sensitivity |
0.776 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.815 |
| Nr of predictions |
18 |
Performance of MaxExpect
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
266 |
| Total TN |
41945 |
| Total FP |
281 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
57 |
| Total FP INCONS |
132 |
| Total FP COMP |
92 |
| Total FN |
171 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.592 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.553
±
0.127
|
| Sensitivity |
0.609 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.585 |
| Nr of predictions |
18 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|