Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of Multilign(20)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(20) |
|
Multilign(20) |
|---|
| MCC |
0.823 |
>
|
0.620 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.774
±
0.129
|
>
|
0.593
±
0.158
|
| Sensitivity |
0.808 |
>
|
0.619 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.842 |
>
|
0.629 |
| Total TP |
308 |
>
|
236 |
| Total TN |
34004 |
>
|
33995 |
| Total FP |
114 |
<
|
191 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
13 |
<
|
40 |
| Total FP INCONS |
45 |
<
|
99 |
| Total FP COMP |
56 |
>
|
52 |
| Total FN |
73 |
<
|
145 |
| P-value |
2.43573297697e-08 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and Multilign(20)).
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and Multilign(20)).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and Multilign(20)).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and Multilign(20)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and Multilign(20)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and Multilign(20)).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
308 |
| Total TN |
34004 |
| Total FP |
114 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
13 |
| Total FP INCONS |
45 |
| Total FP COMP |
56 |
| Total FN |
73 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.823 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.774
±
0.129
|
| Sensitivity |
0.808 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.842 |
| Nr of predictions |
16 |
Performance of Multilign(20)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
236 |
| Total TN |
33995 |
| Total FP |
191 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
40 |
| Total FP INCONS |
99 |
| Total FP COMP |
52 |
| Total FN |
145 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.620 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.593
±
0.158
|
| Sensitivity |
0.619 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.629 |
| Nr of predictions |
16 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
| 
