CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & Pknots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) Pknots
MCC 0.793 > 0.466
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.752 ± 0.129 > 0.508 ± 0.155
Sensitivity 0.776 > 0.510
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.437
Total TP 339 > 223
Total TN 41984 > 41890
Total FP 145 < 368
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 73
Total FP INCONS 63 < 214
Total FP COMP 68 < 81
Total FN 98 < 214
P-value 2.8150742666e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Pknots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Pknots).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Pknots).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Pknots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Pknots).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 339
Total TN 41984
Total FP 145
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 63
Total FP COMP 68
Total FN 98
Total Scores
MCC 0.793
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.752 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.776
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 4 0 0 4 2
3J3D_C 0.87 0.89 0.85 17 948 3 3 0 0 2
3J3E_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 7 2728 11 2 5 4 8
3J3E_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2707 7 0 2 5 2
3J3F_8 0.34 0.37 0.32 7 4739 24 5 10 9 12
3J3F_7 0.93 0.92 0.94 33 2899 6 0 2 4 3
3J3V_B 0.90 0.89 0.92 24 2630 11 0 2 9 3
3ZEX_D 0.93 0.91 0.94 32 2762 6 0 2 4 3
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.24 0.29 7 5350 20 1 16 3 22
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_2 0.25 0.25 0.25 5 4496 25 2 13 10 15
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 1 0 0 1 0
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.68 0.53 0.89 8 463 1 0 1 0 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7
4FRG_B 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 1181 2 0 1 1 4

^top



Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 223
Total TN 41890
Total FP 368
Total FP CONTRA 73
Total FP INCONS 214
Total FP COMP 81
Total FN 214
Total Scores
MCC 0.466
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.508 ± 0.155
Sensitivity 0.510
Positive Predictive Value 0.437
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.79 0.79 0.79 27 2986 12 1 6 5 7
3J3D_C 0.46 0.53 0.42 10 944 14 5 9 0 9
3J3E_8 0.10 0.13 0.09 2 2720 33 5 15 13 13
3J3E_7 0.56 0.56 0.58 19 2708 16 2 12 2 15
3J3F_8 0.42 0.53 0.33 10 4731 37 10 10 17 9
3J3F_7 0.32 0.33 0.32 12 2896 27 2 24 1 24
3J3V_B 0.58 0.63 0.55 17 2625 20 3 11 6 10
3ZEX_D 0.31 0.34 0.30 12 2756 28 5 23 0 23
3ZEX_C 0.10 0.14 0.08 4 5322 54 13 35 6 25
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 25 9 7 9 5
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.29 8 4488 36 9 11 16 12
4A1C_3 0.28 0.30 0.28 11 2723 30 4 25 1 26
4AOB_A 0.19 0.21 0.21 6 1409 23 3 19 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 2 0 0 2 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.55 0.50 0.63 12 1183 7 0 7 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.