CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & RNAshapes [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) RNAshapes
MCC 0.793 > 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.752 ± 0.129 > 0.546 ± 0.133
Sensitivity 0.776 > 0.600
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.540
Total TP 339 > 262
Total TN 41984 > 41915
Total FP 145 < 314
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 60
Total FP INCONS 63 < 163
Total FP COMP 68 < 91
Total FN 98 < 175
P-value 2.9966815982e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNAshapes. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNAshapes).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNAshapes).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNAshapes. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNAshapes).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 339
Total TN 41984
Total FP 145
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 63
Total FP COMP 68
Total FN 98
Total Scores
MCC 0.793
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.752 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.776
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 4 0 0 4 2
3J3D_C 0.87 0.89 0.85 17 948 3 3 0 0 2
3J3E_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 7 2728 11 2 5 4 8
3J3E_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2707 7 0 2 5 2
3J3F_8 0.34 0.37 0.32 7 4739 24 5 10 9 12
3J3F_7 0.93 0.92 0.94 33 2899 6 0 2 4 3
3J3V_B 0.90 0.89 0.92 24 2630 11 0 2 9 3
3ZEX_D 0.93 0.91 0.94 32 2762 6 0 2 4 3
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.24 0.29 7 5350 20 1 16 3 22
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_2 0.25 0.25 0.25 5 4496 25 2 13 10 15
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 1 0 0 1 0
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.68 0.53 0.89 8 463 1 0 1 0 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7
4FRG_B 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 1181 2 0 1 1 4

^top



Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 262
Total TN 41915
Total FP 314
Total FP CONTRA 60
Total FP INCONS 163
Total FP COMP 91
Total FN 175
Total Scores
MCC 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.546 ± 0.133
Sensitivity 0.600
Positive Predictive Value 0.540
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J2L_3 0.77 0.79 0.75 27 2984 14 1 8 5 7
3J3D_C 0.63 0.68 0.59 13 946 9 3 6 0 6
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 29 6 13 10 10
3J3E_7 0.64 0.65 0.65 22 2707 16 1 11 4 12
3J3F_8 0.33 0.42 0.26 8 4730 42 11 12 19 11
3J3F_7 0.83 0.81 0.85 29 2900 7 0 5 2 7
3J3V_B 0.23 0.26 0.23 7 2625 27 4 20 3 20
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.80 0.93 28 2766 6 0 2 4 7
3ZEX_C 0.29 0.34 0.26 10 5335 42 5 24 13 19
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 24 9 7 8 5
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 41 11 16 14 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 7 0 4 3 6
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.