CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) RNAwolf
MCC 0.793 > 0.392
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.752 ± 0.129 > 0.413 ± 0.120
Sensitivity 0.776 > 0.410
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.387
Total TP 339 > 179
Total TN 41984 > 41938
Total FP 145 < 353
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 75
Total FP INCONS 63 < 208
Total FP COMP 68 < 70
Total FN 98 < 258
P-value 3.27388928538e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 339
Total TN 41984
Total FP 145
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 63
Total FP COMP 68
Total FN 98
Total Scores
MCC 0.793
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.752 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.776
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 4 0 0 4 2
3J3D_C 0.87 0.89 0.85 17 948 3 3 0 0 2
3J3E_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 7 2728 11 2 5 4 8
3J3E_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2707 7 0 2 5 2
3J3F_7 0.93 0.92 0.94 33 2899 6 0 2 4 3
3J3F_8 0.34 0.37 0.32 7 4739 24 5 10 9 12
3J3V_B 0.90 0.89 0.92 24 2630 11 0 2 9 3
3ZEX_D 0.93 0.91 0.94 32 2762 6 0 2 4 3
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.24 0.29 7 5350 20 1 16 3 22
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_2 0.25 0.25 0.25 5 4496 25 2 13 10 15
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 1 0 0 1 0
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.68 0.53 0.89 8 463 1 0 1 0 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7
4FRG_B 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 1181 2 0 1 1 4

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 179
Total TN 41938
Total FP 353
Total FP CONTRA 75
Total FP INCONS 208
Total FP COMP 70
Total FN 258
Total Scores
MCC 0.392
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.413 ± 0.120
Sensitivity 0.410
Positive Predictive Value 0.387
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.53 0.55 0.52 11 1091 11 4 6 1 9
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 2 9 1 9
3J2L_3 0.71 0.71 0.73 24 2987 13 1 8 4 10
3J3D_C 0.92 0.95 0.90 18 948 3 2 0 1 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 37 6 17 14 15
3J3E_7 0.57 0.56 0.59 19 2709 15 1 12 2 15
3J3F_7 0.27 0.28 0.28 10 2898 27 4 22 1 26
3J3F_8 0.28 0.37 0.23 7 4730 39 9 15 15 12
3J3V_B 0.59 0.59 0.59 16 2629 16 1 10 5 11
3ZEX_D 0.26 0.26 0.27 9 2763 24 8 16 0 26
3ZEX_C 0.08 0.10 0.07 3 5328 43 18 25 0 26
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4A1C_3 0.32 0.30 0.35 11 2732 21 1 19 1 26
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10
4FRG_B 0.54 0.50 0.60 12 1182 8 3 5 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.