CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.786 > 0.742
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.743 ± 0.136 > 0.721 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.768 > 0.737
Positive Predictive Value 0.808 > 0.753
Total TP 315 > 302
Total TN 39354 > 39343
Total FP 134 < 170
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 34
Total FP INCONS 61 < 65
Total FP COMP 59 < 71
Total FN 95 < 108
P-value 2.61939086268e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and TurboFold(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 315
Total TN 39354
Total FP 134
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 61
Total FP COMP 59
Total FN 95
Total Scores
MCC 0.786
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.743 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.768
Positive Predictive Value 0.808
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 4 0 0 4 2
3J3D_C 0.87 0.89 0.85 17 948 3 3 0 0 2
3J3E_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2707 7 0 2 5 2
3J3E_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 7 2728 11 2 5 4 8
3J3F_7 0.93 0.92 0.94 33 2899 6 0 2 4 3
3J3F_8 0.34 0.37 0.32 7 4739 24 5 10 9 12
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.24 0.29 7 5350 20 1 16 3 22
3ZEX_D 0.93 0.91 0.94 32 2762 6 0 2 4 3
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 1 0 0 1 0
4A1C_2 0.25 0.25 0.25 5 4496 25 2 13 10 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.68 0.53 0.89 8 463 1 0 1 0 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7
4FRG_B 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 1181 2 0 1 1 4

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 302
Total TN 39343
Total FP 170
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 65
Total FP COMP 71
Total FN 108
Total Scores
MCC 0.742
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.721 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.737
Positive Predictive Value 0.753
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 1 5 1 5
3J2L_3 0.92 0.91 0.94 31 2987 5 1 1 3 3
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_7 0.88 0.85 0.91 29 2709 8 0 3 5 5
3J3E_8 0.27 0.33 0.23 5 2720 28 6 11 11 10
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 4 1 1 2 2
3J3F_8 0.42 0.53 0.34 10 4732 37 9 10 18 9
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.45 0.54 13 5350 15 2 9 4 16
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.80 0.93 28 2766 6 0 2 4 7
3ZND_W 0.64 0.75 0.55 6 1180 15 2 3 10 2
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 28 6 13 9 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.