Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of TurboFold(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(20) |
|
TurboFold(seed) |
|---|
| MCC |
0.600 |
>
|
0.546 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.562
±
0.234
|
>
|
0.551
±
0.202
|
| Sensitivity |
0.575 |
>
|
0.553 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.632 |
>
|
0.547 |
| Total TP |
103 |
>
|
99 |
| Total TN |
22398 |
>
|
22380 |
| Total FP |
89 |
<
|
128 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
10 |
<
|
29 |
| Total FP INCONS |
50 |
<
|
53 |
| Total FP COMP |
29 |
<
|
46 |
| Total FN |
76 |
<
|
80 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and TurboFold(seed)).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and TurboFold(seed)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and TurboFold(seed)).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
103 |
| Total TN |
22398 |
| Total FP |
89 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
10 |
| Total FP INCONS |
50 |
| Total FP COMP |
29 |
| Total FN |
76 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.600 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.562
±
0.234
|
| Sensitivity |
0.575 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.632 |
| Nr of predictions |
8 |
Performance of TurboFold(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
99 |
| Total TN |
22380 |
| Total FP |
128 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
29 |
| Total FP INCONS |
53 |
| Total FP COMP |
46 |
| Total FN |
80 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.546 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.551
±
0.202
|
| Sensitivity |
0.553 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.547 |
| Nr of predictions |
8 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
| 
