CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) UNAFold
MCC 0.793 > 0.572
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.752 ± 0.129 > 0.541 ± 0.130
Sensitivity 0.776 > 0.606
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.549
Total TP 339 > 265
Total TN 41984 > 41917
Total FP 145 < 316
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 58
Total FP INCONS 63 < 160
Total FP COMP 68 < 98
Total FN 98 < 172
P-value 2.8150742666e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 339
Total TN 41984
Total FP 145
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 63
Total FP COMP 68
Total FN 98
Total Scores
MCC 0.793
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.752 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.776
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 4 0 0 4 2
3J3D_C 0.87 0.89 0.85 17 948 3 3 0 0 2
3J3E_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 7 2728 11 2 5 4 8
3J3E_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2707 7 0 2 5 2
3J3F_8 0.34 0.37 0.32 7 4739 24 5 10 9 12
3J3F_7 0.93 0.92 0.94 33 2899 6 0 2 4 3
3J3V_B 0.90 0.89 0.92 24 2630 11 0 2 9 3
3ZEX_D 0.93 0.91 0.94 32 2762 6 0 2 4 3
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.24 0.29 7 5350 20 1 16 3 22
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_2 0.25 0.25 0.25 5 4496 25 2 13 10 15
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 1 0 0 1 0
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.68 0.53 0.89 8 463 1 0 1 0 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7
4FRG_B 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 1181 2 0 1 1 4

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 265
Total TN 41917
Total FP 316
Total FP CONTRA 58
Total FP INCONS 160
Total FP COMP 98
Total FN 172
Total Scores
MCC 0.572
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.541 ± 0.130
Sensitivity 0.606
Positive Predictive Value 0.549
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 6 0 5 1 5
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 12 1 7 4 6
3J3D_C 0.33 0.37 0.32 7 946 15 3 12 0 12
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.13 3 2718 32 6 15 11 12
3J3E_7 0.58 0.59 0.59 20 2707 16 2 12 2 14
3J3F_8 0.32 0.42 0.25 8 4729 44 12 12 20 11
3J3F_7 0.86 0.86 0.86 31 2898 6 1 4 1 5
3J3V_B 0.75 0.74 0.77 20 2630 16 0 6 10 7
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 6 0 2 4 6
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.26 10 5336 43 5 23 15 19
3ZND_W 0.25 0.38 0.18 3 1174 22 8 6 8 5
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 11 17 14 15
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.