Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of Afold
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(seed) |
|
Afold |
| MCC |
0.769 |
>
|
0.538 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.714
±
0.196
|
>
|
0.544
±
0.283
|
| Sensitivity |
0.706 |
>
|
0.566 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.842 |
>
|
0.520 |
| Total TP |
96 |
>
|
77 |
| Total TN |
12929 |
>
|
12895 |
| Total FP |
42 |
<
|
106 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
4 |
<
|
21 |
| Total FP INCONS |
14 |
<
|
50 |
| Total FP COMP |
24 |
<
|
35 |
| Total FN |
40 |
<
|
59 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Afold).
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Afold).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Afold).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Afold).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
96 |
| Total TN |
12929 |
| Total FP |
42 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
4 |
| Total FP INCONS |
14 |
| Total FP COMP |
24 |
| Total FN |
40 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.769 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.714
±
0.196
|
| Sensitivity |
0.706 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.842 |
| Nr of predictions |
6 |
Performance of Afold
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for Afold
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
77 |
| Total TN |
12895 |
| Total FP |
106 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
21 |
| Total FP INCONS |
50 |
| Total FP COMP |
35 |
| Total FN |
59 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.538 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.544
±
0.283
|
| Sensitivity |
0.566 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.520 |
| Nr of predictions |
6 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|