CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) Afold
MCC 0.769 > 0.538
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.714 ± 0.196 > 0.544 ± 0.283
Sensitivity 0.706 > 0.566
Positive Predictive Value 0.842 > 0.520
Total TP 96 > 77
Total TN 12929 > 12895
Total FP 42 < 106
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 21
Total FP INCONS 14 < 50
Total FP COMP 24 < 35
Total FN 40 < 59
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold).

  2. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 96
Total TN 12929
Total FP 42
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 40
Total Scores
MCC 0.769
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.714 ± 0.196
Sensitivity 0.706
Positive Predictive Value 0.842
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 0 5 0 12
3J3E_8 0.71 0.67 0.77 10 2729 8 1 2 5 5
3W3S_B 0.80 0.73 0.89 24 1962 6 1 2 3 9
3ZEX_D 0.96 0.94 0.97 33 2762 6 0 1 5 2
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 77
Total TN 12895
Total FP 106
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 50
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 59
Total Scores
MCC 0.538
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.544 ± 0.283
Sensitivity 0.566
Positive Predictive Value 0.520
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 31 6 13 12 10
3W3S_B 0.55 0.55 0.56 18 1957 15 4 10 1 15
3ZEX_D 0.82 0.77 0.87 27 2765 8 0 4 4 8
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.