CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.876 > 0.691
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.842 ± 0.066 > 0.675 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.839 > 0.693
Positive Predictive Value 0.916 > 0.696
Total TP 460 > 380
Total TN 44423 > 44379
Total FP 135 < 243
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 52
Total FP INCONS 28 < 114
Total FP COMP 93 > 77
Total FN 88 < 168
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 460
Total TN 44423
Total FP 135
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 28
Total FP COMP 93
Total FN 88
Total Scores
MCC 0.876
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.842 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.839
Positive Predictive Value 0.916
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 0 5 0 12
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 2 0 0 2 0
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 5 0 0 5 2
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 4 3 0 1 1
3J3E_7 0.97 0.97 0.97 33 2707 6 0 1 5 1
3J3E_8 0.71 0.67 0.77 10 2729 8 1 2 5 5
3J3F_7 0.99 0.97 1.00 35 2899 4 0 0 4 1
3J3F_8 0.86 0.84 0.89 16 4743 13 2 0 11 3
3J3V_B 0.90 0.89 0.92 24 2630 14 0 2 12 3
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 8 0 0 8 2
3W3S_B 0.80 0.73 0.89 24 1962 6 1 2 3 9
3ZEX_D 0.96 0.94 0.97 33 2762 6 0 1 5 2
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 16 0 4 12 2
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 2 0 0 2 0
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7
4FRG_B 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 1180 3 0 2 1 4
4FRN_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 22 1823 3 2 1 0 6
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 380
Total TN 44379
Total FP 243
Total FP CONTRA 52
Total FP INCONS 114
Total FP COMP 77
Total FN 168
Total Scores
MCC 0.691
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.675 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.693
Positive Predictive Value 0.696
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_0 0.41 0.52 0.34 11 1187 22 7 14 1 10
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2986 8 0 2 6 2
3J3D_C 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 946 7 3 4 0 4
3J3E_7 0.85 0.85 0.85 29 2707 9 0 5 4 5
3J3E_8 0.07 0.07 0.09 1 2731 16 4 6 6 14
3J3F_7 0.79 0.81 0.78 29 2897 10 1 7 2 7
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.27 9 4728 36 11 13 12 10
3J3V_B 0.72 0.67 0.78 18 2633 11 1 4 6 9
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3W3S_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 29 1960 1 0 0 1 4
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.83 0.91 29 2764 8 0 3 5 6
3ZND_W 0.75 0.75 0.75 6 1183 13 0 2 11 2
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 7 0 6 1 8
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.43 0.50 0.40 12 1172 18 6 12 0 12
4FRN_A 0.37 0.46 0.32 13 1807 28 11 17 0 15
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.