Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(seed) |
|
CentroidHomfold‑LAST |
| MCC |
0.876 |
>
|
0.691 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.842
±
0.066
|
>
|
0.675
±
0.129
|
| Sensitivity |
0.839 |
>
|
0.693 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.916 |
>
|
0.696 |
| Total TP |
460 |
>
|
380 |
| Total TN |
44423 |
>
|
44379 |
| Total FP |
135 |
<
|
243 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
14 |
<
|
52 |
| Total FP INCONS |
28 |
<
|
114 |
| Total FP COMP |
93 |
>
|
77 |
| Total FN |
88 |
<
|
168 |
| P-value |
3.56938820447e-08 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
460 |
| Total TN |
44423 |
| Total FP |
135 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
14 |
| Total FP INCONS |
28 |
| Total FP COMP |
93 |
| Total FN |
88 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.876 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.842
±
0.066
|
| Sensitivity |
0.839 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.916 |
| Nr of predictions |
23 |
Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
380 |
| Total TN |
44379 |
| Total FP |
243 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
52 |
| Total FP INCONS |
114 |
| Total FP COMP |
77 |
| Total FN |
168 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.691 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.675
±
0.129
|
| Sensitivity |
0.693 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.696 |
| Nr of predictions |
23 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|