CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & MXScarna(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) MXScarna(seed)
MCC 0.865 > 0.769
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.835 ± 0.062 > 0.673 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.839 > 0.735
Positive Predictive Value 0.893 > 0.805
Total TP 840 > 736
Total TN 472436 < 472463
Total FP 276 < 368
Total FP CONTRA 32 < 44
Total FP INCONS 69 < 134
Total FP COMP 175 < 190
Total FN 161 < 265
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MXScarna(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MXScarna(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MXScarna(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MXScarna(seed)).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MXScarna(seed)).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MXScarna(seed)).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MXScarna(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MXScarna(seed)).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MXScarna(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MXScarna(seed)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 840
Total TN 472436
Total FP 276
Total FP CONTRA 32
Total FP INCONS 69
Total FP COMP 175
Total FN 161
Total Scores
MCC 0.865
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.835 ± 0.062
Sensitivity 0.839
Positive Predictive Value 0.893
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 0 5 0 12
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_2 0.86 0.86 0.86 356 421956 129 18 38 73 56
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 2 0 0 2 0
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 5 0 0 5 2
3J3E_7 0.97 0.97 0.97 33 2707 6 0 1 5 1
3J3E_8 0.71 0.67 0.77 10 2729 8 1 2 5 5
3J3F_8 0.86 0.84 0.89 16 4743 13 2 0 11 3
3J3F_7 0.99 0.97 1.00 35 2899 4 0 0 4 1
3J3V_B 0.90 0.89 0.92 24 2630 14 0 2 12 3
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 8 0 0 8 2
3W1K_J 0.85 0.81 0.89 25 1650 4 2 1 1 6
3W3S_B 0.80 0.73 0.89 24 1962 6 1 2 3 9
3ZEX_D 0.96 0.94 0.97 33 2762 6 0 1 5 2
3ZEX_C 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 5354 12 1 2 9 12
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 16 0 4 12 2
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 2 0 0 2 0
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7
4FRG_B 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 1180 3 0 2 1 4
4FRN_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 22 1823 3 2 1 0 6
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top



Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 736
Total TN 472463
Total FP 368
Total FP CONTRA 44
Total FP INCONS 134
Total FP COMP 190
Total FN 265
Total Scores
MCC 0.769
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.673 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.735
Positive Predictive Value 0.805
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 12 0 10 2 18
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3J20_0 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1200 1 1 0 0 3
3J20_2 0.83 0.82 0.84 337 421969 147 14 48 85 75
3J20_1 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1093 1 0 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.79 0.76 0.81 26 2988 11 1 5 5 8
3J3E_7 0.87 0.88 0.86 30 2706 9 2 3 4 4
3J3E_8 0.23 0.20 0.27 3 2731 14 3 5 6 12
3J3F_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 9 4743 21 5 4 12 10
3J3F_7 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 2897 7 1 2 4 2
3J3V_B 0.85 0.81 0.88 22 2631 15 0 3 12 5
3UZL_B 0.83 0.75 0.92 12 1280 8 0 1 7 4
3W1K_J 0.92 0.90 0.93 28 1648 3 1 1 1 3
3W3S_B 0.74 0.70 0.79 23 1960 7 0 6 1 10
3ZEX_D 0.87 0.86 0.88 30 2762 11 0 4 7 5
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 21 3 6 12 20
3ZND_W 0.59 0.63 0.56 5 1182 15 0 4 11 3
4A1C_3 0.92 0.92 0.92 34 2726 6 0 3 3 3
4A1C_2 0.45 0.40 0.50 8 4500 20 4 4 12 12
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 10 2 5 3 9
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 1 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.49 0.42 0.59 10 1185 8 2 5 1 14
4FRN_A 0.70 0.68 0.73 19 1822 7 3 4 0 9
4JF2_A 0.41 0.33 0.53 8 1067 8 1 6 1 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.