Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of MXScarna(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & MXScarna(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(seed) |
|
MXScarna(seed) |
| MCC |
0.865 |
>
|
0.769 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.835
±
0.062
|
>
|
0.673
±
0.107
|
| Sensitivity |
0.839 |
>
|
0.735 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.893 |
>
|
0.805 |
| Total TP |
840 |
>
|
736 |
| Total TN |
472436 |
<
|
472463 |
| Total FP |
276 |
<
|
368 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
32 |
<
|
44 |
| Total FP INCONS |
69 |
<
|
134 |
| Total FP COMP |
175 |
<
|
190 |
| Total FN |
161 |
<
|
265 |
| P-value |
5.23657817852e-08 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MXScarna(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and MXScarna(seed)).
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MXScarna(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and MXScarna(seed)).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and MXScarna(seed)).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and MXScarna(seed)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MXScarna(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and MXScarna(seed)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MXScarna(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and MXScarna(seed)).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
840 |
| Total TN |
472436 |
| Total FP |
276 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
32 |
| Total FP INCONS |
69 |
| Total FP COMP |
175 |
| Total FN |
161 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.865 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.835
±
0.062
|
| Sensitivity |
0.839 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.893 |
| Nr of predictions |
25 |
Performance of MXScarna(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
736 |
| Total TN |
472463 |
| Total FP |
368 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
44 |
| Total FP INCONS |
134 |
| Total FP COMP |
190 |
| Total FN |
265 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.769 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.673
±
0.107
|
| Sensitivity |
0.735 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.805 |
| Nr of predictions |
25 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|