CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & PETfold_pre2.0(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) PETfold_pre2.0(20)
MCC 0.858 > 0.796
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.849 ± 0.063 > 0.755 ± 0.122
Sensitivity 0.820 > 0.768
Positive Predictive Value 0.898 > 0.827
Total TP 555 > 520
Total TN 202464 > 202453
Total FP 201 < 214
Total FP CONTRA 18 < 26
Total FP INCONS 45 < 83
Total FP COMP 138 > 105
Total FN 122 < 157
P-value 3.18846395401e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 555
Total TN 202464
Total FP 201
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 138
Total FN 122
Total Scores
MCC 0.858
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.849 ± 0.063
Sensitivity 0.820
Positive Predictive Value 0.898
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 2 0 0 2 0
3J2C_N 0.80 0.75 0.86 180 160472 78 7 23 48 60
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 5 0 0 5 2
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 4 3 0 1 1
3J3E_8 0.71 0.67 0.77 10 2729 8 1 2 5 5
3J3E_7 0.97 0.97 0.97 33 2707 6 0 1 5 1
3J3F_8 0.86 0.84 0.89 16 4743 13 2 0 11 3
3J3F_7 0.99 0.97 1.00 35 2899 4 0 0 4 1
3J3V_B 0.90 0.89 0.92 24 2630 14 0 2 12 3
3ZEX_D 0.96 0.94 0.97 33 2762 6 0 1 5 2
3ZEX_C 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 5354 12 1 2 9 12
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 16 0 4 12 2
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 2 0 0 2 0
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7
4FRG_B 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 1180 3 0 2 1 4

^top



Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 520
Total TN 202453
Total FP 214
Total FP CONTRA 26
Total FP INCONS 83
Total FP COMP 105
Total FN 157
Total Scores
MCC 0.796
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.755 ± 0.122
Sensitivity 0.768
Positive Predictive Value 0.827
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2C_N 0.80 0.75 0.85 181 160469 69 12 20 37 59
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 4 0 0 4 2
3J3D_C 0.87 0.89 0.85 17 948 3 3 0 0 2
3J3E_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 7 2728 11 2 5 4 8
3J3E_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2707 7 0 2 5 2
3J3F_8 0.34 0.37 0.32 7 4739 24 5 10 9 12
3J3F_7 0.93 0.92 0.94 33 2899 6 0 2 4 3
3J3V_B 0.90 0.89 0.92 24 2630 11 0 2 9 3
3ZEX_D 0.93 0.91 0.94 32 2762 6 0 2 4 3
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.24 0.29 7 5350 20 1 16 3 22
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_2 0.25 0.25 0.25 5 4496 25 2 13 10 15
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 1 0 0 1 0
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.68 0.53 0.89 8 463 1 0 1 0 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7
4FRG_B 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 1181 2 0 1 1 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.