CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & PPfold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) PPfold(20)
MCC 0.886 > 0.783
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.848 ± 0.071 > 0.729 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.856 > 0.749
Positive Predictive Value 0.919 > 0.823
Total TP 351 > 307
Total TN 39362 < 39371
Total FP 109 < 112
Total FP CONTRA 11 < 12
Total FP INCONS 20 < 54
Total FP COMP 78 > 46
Total FN 59 < 103
P-value 3.16042554876e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PPfold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PPfold(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PPfold(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PPfold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PPfold(20)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 351
Total TN 39362
Total FP 109
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 20
Total FP COMP 78
Total FN 59
Total Scores
MCC 0.886
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.848 ± 0.071
Sensitivity 0.856
Positive Predictive Value 0.919
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 2 0 0 2 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 5 0 0 5 2
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 4 3 0 1 1
3J3E_7 0.97 0.97 0.97 33 2707 6 0 1 5 1
3J3E_8 0.71 0.67 0.77 10 2729 8 1 2 5 5
3J3F_7 0.99 0.97 1.00 35 2899 4 0 0 4 1
3J3F_8 0.86 0.84 0.89 16 4743 13 2 0 11 3
3ZEX_C 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 5354 12 1 2 9 12
3ZEX_D 0.96 0.94 0.97 33 2762 6 0 1 5 2
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 16 0 4 12 2
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 2 0 0 2 0
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7
4FRG_B 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 1180 3 0 2 1 4

^top



Performance of PPfold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 307
Total TN 39371
Total FP 112
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 103
Total Scores
MCC 0.783
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.729 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.749
Positive Predictive Value 0.823
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 4 0 0 4 2
3J3D_C 0.87 0.89 0.85 17 948 3 3 0 0 2
3J3E_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2707 5 0 2 3 2
3J3E_8 0.21 0.20 0.23 3 2729 13 2 8 3 12
3J3F_7 0.93 0.92 0.94 33 2899 4 0 2 2 3
3J3F_8 0.37 0.37 0.37 7 4742 20 5 7 8 12
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.31 0.47 9 5355 14 0 10 4 20
3ZEX_D 0.93 0.91 0.94 32 2762 6 0 2 4 3
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 2 0 2 0 3
4A1C_2 0.27 0.25 0.29 5 4499 16 1 11 4 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.63 0.47 0.88 7 464 1 0 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.64 0.53 0.80 8 486 2 0 2 0 7
4FRG_B 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 1183 1 0 1 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.