CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & Pknots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) Pknots
MCC 0.867 > 0.550
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.836 ± 0.062 > 0.585 ± 0.128
Sensitivity 0.826 > 0.587
Positive Predictive Value 0.913 > 0.525
Total TP 502 > 357
Total TN 51427 > 51297
Total FP 151 < 412
Total FP CONTRA 17 < 85
Total FP INCONS 31 < 238
Total FP COMP 103 > 89
Total FN 106 < 251
P-value 4.94031556815e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Pknots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Pknots).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Pknots).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Pknots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Pknots).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 502
Total TN 51427
Total FP 151
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 31
Total FP COMP 103
Total FN 106
Total Scores
MCC 0.867
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.836 ± 0.062
Sensitivity 0.826
Positive Predictive Value 0.913
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 0 5 0 12
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 2 0 0 2 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 5 0 0 5 2
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 4 3 0 1 1
3J3E_8 0.71 0.67 0.77 10 2729 8 1 2 5 5
3J3E_7 0.97 0.97 0.97 33 2707 6 0 1 5 1
3J3F_7 0.99 0.97 1.00 35 2899 4 0 0 4 1
3J3F_8 0.86 0.84 0.89 16 4743 13 2 0 11 3
3J3V_B 0.90 0.89 0.92 24 2630 14 0 2 12 3
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 8 0 0 8 2
3W1K_J 0.85 0.81 0.89 25 1650 4 2 1 1 6
3W3S_B 0.80 0.73 0.89 24 1962 6 1 2 3 9
3ZEX_D 0.96 0.94 0.97 33 2762 6 0 1 5 2
3ZEX_C 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 5354 12 1 2 9 12
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 16 0 4 12 2
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 2 0 0 2 0
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7
4FRG_B 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 1180 3 0 2 1 4
4FRN_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 22 1823 3 2 1 0 6
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top



Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 357
Total TN 51297
Total FP 412
Total FP CONTRA 85
Total FP INCONS 238
Total FP COMP 89
Total FN 251
Total Scores
MCC 0.550
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.585 ± 0.128
Sensitivity 0.587
Positive Predictive Value 0.525
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.83 0.83 0.83 15 510 3 2 1 0 3
3J16_L 0.41 0.43 0.41 9 1137 13 1 12 0 12
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.79 0.79 0.79 27 2986 12 1 6 5 7
3J3D_C 0.46 0.53 0.42 10 944 14 5 9 0 9
3J3E_8 0.10 0.13 0.09 2 2720 33 5 15 13 13
3J3E_7 0.56 0.56 0.58 19 2708 16 2 12 2 15
3J3F_7 0.32 0.33 0.32 12 2896 27 2 24 1 24
3J3F_8 0.42 0.53 0.33 10 4731 37 10 10 17 9
3J3V_B 0.58 0.63 0.55 17 2625 20 3 11 6 10
3UZL_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 1277 7 0 0 7 0
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.78 0.76 0.81 25 1958 7 1 5 1 8
3ZEX_D 0.31 0.34 0.30 12 2756 28 5 23 0 23
3ZEX_C 0.10 0.14 0.08 4 5322 54 13 35 6 25
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 25 9 7 9 5
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.29 8 4488 36 9 11 16 12
4A1C_3 0.28 0.30 0.28 11 2723 30 4 25 1 26
4AOB_A 0.19 0.21 0.21 6 1409 23 3 19 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 2 0 0 2 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.55 0.50 0.63 12 1183 7 0 7 0 12
4FRN_A 0.57 0.54 0.63 15 1824 9 3 6 0 13
4JF2_A 0.92 1.00 0.86 24 1054 4 4 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.