Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of RNASLOpt
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(seed) |
|
RNASLOpt |
| MCC |
0.867 |
>
|
0.591 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.836
±
0.062
|
>
|
0.590
±
0.115
|
| Sensitivity |
0.826 |
>
|
0.579 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.913 |
>
|
0.613 |
| Total TP |
502 |
>
|
352 |
| Total TN |
51427 |
>
|
51403 |
| Total FP |
151 |
<
|
305 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
17 |
<
|
71 |
| Total FP INCONS |
31 |
<
|
151 |
| Total FP COMP |
103 |
>
|
83 |
| Total FN |
106 |
<
|
256 |
| P-value |
5.1503931209e-08 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and RNASLOpt).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and RNASLOpt).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and RNASLOpt).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
502 |
| Total TN |
51427 |
| Total FP |
151 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
17 |
| Total FP INCONS |
31 |
| Total FP COMP |
103 |
| Total FN |
106 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.867 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.836
±
0.062
|
| Sensitivity |
0.826 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.913 |
| Nr of predictions |
25 |
Performance of RNASLOpt
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
352 |
| Total TN |
51403 |
| Total FP |
305 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
71 |
| Total FP INCONS |
151 |
| Total FP COMP |
83 |
| Total FN |
256 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.591 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.590
±
0.115
|
| Sensitivity |
0.579 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.613 |
| Nr of predictions |
25 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|