CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.737 > 0.390
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.721 ± 0.136 > 0.380 ± 0.216
Sensitivity 0.652 > 0.323
Positive Predictive Value 0.837 > 0.481
Total TP 103 > 51
Total TN 20869 < 20886
Total FP 57 < 85
Total FP CONTRA 7 < 16
Total FP INCONS 13 < 39
Total FP COMP 37 > 30
Total FN 55 < 107
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 103
Total TN 20869
Total FP 57
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 37
Total FN 55
Total Scores
MCC 0.737
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.721 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.652
Positive Predictive Value 0.837
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 0 5 0 12
3J3E_8 0.71 0.67 0.77 10 2729 8 1 2 5 5
3J3F_8 0.86 0.84 0.89 16 4743 13 2 0 11 3
3W3S_B 0.80 0.73 0.89 24 1962 6 1 2 3 9
3ZEX_C 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 5354 12 1 2 9 12
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 51
Total TN 20886
Total FP 85
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 39
Total FP COMP 30
Total FN 107
Total Scores
MCC 0.390
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.380 ± 0.216
Sensitivity 0.323
Positive Predictive Value 0.481
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 10 0 10 0 18
3J3E_8 0.18 0.20 0.18 3 2725 22 5 9 8 12
3J3F_8 0.47 0.47 0.47 9 4742 18 5 5 8 10
3W3S_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 12 1977 1 0 0 1 21
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 14 2 7 5 20
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12
4JF2_A 0.64 0.42 1.00 10 1072 0 0 0 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.