CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & RNAshapes [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) RNAshapes
MCC 0.867 > 0.596
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.836 ± 0.062 > 0.581 ± 0.104
Sensitivity 0.826 > 0.620
Positive Predictive Value 0.913 > 0.583
Total TP 502 > 377
Total TN 51427 > 51330
Total FP 151 < 366
Total FP CONTRA 17 < 69
Total FP INCONS 31 < 201
Total FP COMP 103 > 96
Total FN 106 < 231
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAshapes. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAshapes).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAshapes).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAshapes. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAshapes).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 502
Total TN 51427
Total FP 151
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 31
Total FP COMP 103
Total FN 106
Total Scores
MCC 0.867
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.836 ± 0.062
Sensitivity 0.826
Positive Predictive Value 0.913
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 0 5 0 12
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 2 0 0 2 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 5 0 0 5 2
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 4 3 0 1 1
3J3E_8 0.71 0.67 0.77 10 2729 8 1 2 5 5
3J3E_7 0.97 0.97 0.97 33 2707 6 0 1 5 1
3J3F_7 0.99 0.97 1.00 35 2899 4 0 0 4 1
3J3F_8 0.86 0.84 0.89 16 4743 13 2 0 11 3
3J3V_B 0.90 0.89 0.92 24 2630 14 0 2 12 3
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 8 0 0 8 2
3W1K_J 0.85 0.81 0.89 25 1650 4 2 1 1 6
3W3S_B 0.80 0.73 0.89 24 1962 6 1 2 3 9
3ZEX_D 0.96 0.94 0.97 33 2762 6 0 1 5 2
3ZEX_C 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 5354 12 1 2 9 12
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 16 0 4 12 2
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 2 0 0 2 0
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7
4FRG_B 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 1180 3 0 2 1 4
4FRN_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 22 1823 3 2 1 0 6
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top



Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 377
Total TN 51330
Total FP 366
Total FP CONTRA 69
Total FP INCONS 201
Total FP COMP 96
Total FN 231
Total Scores
MCC 0.596
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.581 ± 0.104
Sensitivity 0.620
Positive Predictive Value 0.583
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 0 5 0 7
3J16_L 0.59 0.57 0.63 12 1140 7 0 7 0 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J2L_3 0.77 0.79 0.75 27 2984 14 1 8 5 7
3J3D_C 0.63 0.68 0.59 13 946 9 3 6 0 6
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 29 6 13 10 10
3J3E_7 0.64 0.65 0.65 22 2707 16 1 11 4 12
3J3F_7 0.83 0.81 0.85 29 2900 7 0 5 2 7
3J3F_8 0.33 0.42 0.26 8 4730 42 11 12 19 11
3J3V_B 0.23 0.26 0.23 7 2625 27 4 20 3 20
3UZL_B 0.43 0.50 0.38 8 1272 17 4 9 4 8
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.60 0.58 0.63 19 1959 12 2 9 1 14
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.80 0.93 28 2766 6 0 2 4 7
3ZEX_C 0.29 0.34 0.26 10 5335 42 5 24 13 19
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 24 9 7 8 5
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 41 11 16 14 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 7 0 4 3 6
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15
4FRN_A 0.59 0.57 0.62 16 1822 10 2 8 0 12
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.