CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.853 > 0.515
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.833 ± 0.059 > 0.143 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.822 > 0.388
Positive Predictive Value 0.885 > 0.686
Total TP 1014 > 478
Total TN 631225 < 631674
Total FP 344 > 312
Total FP CONTRA 42 < 43
Total FP INCONS 90 < 176
Total FP COMP 212 > 93
Total FN 219 < 755
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1014
Total TN 631225
Total FP 344
Total FP CONTRA 42
Total FP INCONS 90
Total FP COMP 212
Total FN 219
Total Scores
MCC 0.853
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.833 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.822
Positive Predictive Value 0.885
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 0 5 0 12
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 2 0 0 2 0
3J20_2 0.86 0.86 0.86 356 421956 129 18 38 73 56
3J2C_N 0.80 0.75 0.86 180 160472 78 7 23 48 60
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 5 0 0 5 2
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 4 3 0 1 1
3J3E_8 0.71 0.67 0.77 10 2729 8 1 2 5 5
3J3E_7 0.97 0.97 0.97 33 2707 6 0 1 5 1
3J3F_8 0.86 0.84 0.89 16 4743 13 2 0 11 3
3J3F_7 0.99 0.97 1.00 35 2899 4 0 0 4 1
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 8 0 0 8 2
3W1K_J 0.85 0.81 0.89 25 1650 4 2 1 1 6
3W3S_B 0.80 0.73 0.89 24 1962 6 1 2 3 9
3ZEX_C 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 5354 12 1 2 9 12
3ZEX_D 0.96 0.94 0.97 33 2762 6 0 1 5 2
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 16 0 4 12 2
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 2 0 0 2 0
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7
4FRG_B 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 1180 3 0 2 1 4
4FRN_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 22 1823 3 2 1 0 6
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 478
Total TN 631674
Total FP 312
Total FP CONTRA 43
Total FP INCONS 176
Total FP COMP 93
Total FN 755
Total Scores
MCC 0.515
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.143 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.388
Positive Predictive Value 0.686
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1158 1 0 1 0 21
3J20_0 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1215 4 0 4 0 21
3J20_1 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1108 5 0 4 1 20
3J20_2 0.77 0.76 0.78 312 421966 152 18 72 62 100
3J2C_N 0.65 0.53 0.79 127 160521 59 9 25 25 113
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3015 5 0 5 0 34
3J3D_C -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 964 4 1 3 0 19
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3E_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2733 8 1 7 0 34
3J3F_8 0.19 0.11 0.33 2 4755 5 3 1 1 17
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2930 4 1 3 0 36
3UZL_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1287 6 3 3 0 16
3W1K_J 0.57 0.35 0.92 11 1666 1 0 1 0 20
3W3S_B 0.45 0.36 0.57 12 1968 10 1 8 1 21
3ZEX_C 0.13 0.07 0.25 2 5366 6 2 4 0 27
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2794 2 0 2 0 35
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1189 4 0 2 2 8
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2759 4 2 2 0 37
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4512 5 2 2 1 20
4AOB_A 0.42 0.21 0.86 6 1430 1 0 1 0 23
4ENB_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 467 2 0 2 0 12
4ENC_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 491 2 0 2 0 12
4FRG_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1200 2 0 2 0 24
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1845 3 0 3 0 28
4JF2_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1078 4 0 4 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.