CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.789 > 0.608
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.750 ± 0.097 > 0.585 ± 0.199
Sensitivity 0.721 > 0.600
Positive Predictive Value 0.867 > 0.625
Total TP 202 > 168
Total TN 27464 > 27428
Total FP 74 < 147
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 34
Total FP INCONS 19 < 67
Total FP COMP 43 < 46
Total FN 78 < 112
P-value 1.31583660336e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 202
Total TN 27464
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 19
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 78
Total Scores
MCC 0.789
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.750 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.721
Positive Predictive Value 0.867
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 0 5 0 12
3J3E_8 0.71 0.67 0.77 10 2729 8 1 2 5 5
3J3F_8 0.86 0.84 0.89 16 4743 13 2 0 11 3
3W1K_J 0.85 0.81 0.89 25 1650 4 2 1 1 6
3ZEX_C 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 5354 12 1 2 9 12
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 2 0 0 2 0
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7
4FRN_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 22 1823 3 2 1 0 6
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 168
Total TN 27428
Total FP 147
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 112
Total Scores
MCC 0.608
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.585 ± 0.199
Sensitivity 0.600
Positive Predictive Value 0.625
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J3E_8 0.27 0.33 0.23 5 2720 28 6 11 11 10
3J3F_8 0.42 0.53 0.34 10 4732 35 9 10 16 9
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.45 0.54 13 5350 15 2 9 4 16
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRN_A 0.79 0.71 0.87 20 1825 3 1 2 0 8
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.