CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) UNAFold
MCC 0.866 > 0.572
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.837 ± 0.059 > 0.539 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.841 > 0.590
Positive Predictive Value 0.892 > 0.557
Total TP 858 > 602
Total TN 473383 > 473264
Total FP 280 < 638
Total FP CONTRA 35 < 107
Total FP INCONS 69 < 372
Total FP COMP 176 > 159
Total FN 162 < 418
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 858
Total TN 473383
Total FP 280
Total FP CONTRA 35
Total FP INCONS 69
Total FP COMP 176
Total FN 162
Total Scores
MCC 0.866
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.837 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.841
Positive Predictive Value 0.892
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 0 5 0 12
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 2 0 0 2 0
3J20_2 0.86 0.86 0.86 356 421956 129 18 38 73 56
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 5 0 0 5 2
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 4 3 0 1 1
3J3E_8 0.71 0.67 0.77 10 2729 8 1 2 5 5
3J3E_7 0.97 0.97 0.97 33 2707 6 0 1 5 1
3J3F_8 0.86 0.84 0.89 16 4743 13 2 0 11 3
3J3F_7 0.99 0.97 1.00 35 2899 4 0 0 4 1
3J3V_B 0.90 0.89 0.92 24 2630 14 0 2 12 3
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 8 0 0 8 2
3W1K_J 0.85 0.81 0.89 25 1650 4 2 1 1 6
3W3S_B 0.80 0.73 0.89 24 1962 6 1 2 3 9
3ZEX_D 0.96 0.94 0.97 33 2762 6 0 1 5 2
3ZEX_C 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 5354 12 1 2 9 12
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 16 0 4 12 2
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 2 0 0 2 0
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7
4FRG_B 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 1180 3 0 2 1 4
4FRN_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 22 1823 3 2 1 0 6
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 602
Total TN 473264
Total FP 638
Total FP CONTRA 107
Total FP INCONS 372
Total FP COMP 159
Total FN 418
Total Scores
MCC 0.572
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.590
Positive Predictive Value 0.557
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J16_L 0.31 0.33 0.30 7 1136 16 3 13 0 14
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 6 0 5 1 5
3J20_2 0.57 0.58 0.55 240 421931 250 36 161 53 172
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 12 1 7 4 6
3J3D_C 0.33 0.37 0.32 7 946 15 3 12 0 12
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.13 3 2718 32 6 15 11 12
3J3E_7 0.58 0.59 0.59 20 2707 16 2 12 2 14
3J3F_8 0.32 0.42 0.25 8 4729 44 12 12 20 11
3J3F_7 0.86 0.86 0.86 31 2898 6 1 4 1 5
3J3V_B 0.75 0.74 0.77 20 2630 16 0 6 10 7
3UZL_B 0.49 0.50 0.50 8 1277 15 0 8 7 8
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.61 0.61 0.63 20 1957 13 4 8 1 13
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 6 0 2 4 6
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.26 10 5336 43 5 23 15 19
3ZND_W 0.25 0.38 0.18 3 1174 22 8 6 8 5
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 11 17 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15
4FRN_A 0.48 0.46 0.52 13 1823 12 2 10 0 15
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.