CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) Vsfold4
MCC 0.878 > 0.538
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.842 ± 0.070 > 0.551 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.842 > 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.918 > 0.554
Total TP 438 > 277
Total TN 42600 > 42577
Total FP 132 < 289
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 64
Total FP INCONS 27 < 159
Total FP COMP 93 > 66
Total FN 82 < 243
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 438
Total TN 42600
Total FP 132
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 27
Total FP COMP 93
Total FN 82
Total Scores
MCC 0.878
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.842 ± 0.070
Sensitivity 0.842
Positive Predictive Value 0.918
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 0 5 0 12
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 2 0 0 2 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 5 0 0 5 2
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 4 3 0 1 1
3J3E_8 0.71 0.67 0.77 10 2729 8 1 2 5 5
3J3E_7 0.97 0.97 0.97 33 2707 6 0 1 5 1
3J3F_8 0.86 0.84 0.89 16 4743 13 2 0 11 3
3J3F_7 0.99 0.97 1.00 35 2899 4 0 0 4 1
3J3V_B 0.90 0.89 0.92 24 2630 14 0 2 12 3
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 8 0 0 8 2
3W3S_B 0.80 0.73 0.89 24 1962 6 1 2 3 9
3ZEX_D 0.96 0.94 0.97 33 2762 6 0 1 5 2
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 16 0 4 12 2
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 2 0 0 2 0
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7
4FRG_B 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 1180 3 0 2 1 4
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 277
Total TN 42577
Total FP 289
Total FP CONTRA 64
Total FP INCONS 159
Total FP COMP 66
Total FN 243
Total Scores
MCC 0.538
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.551 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.554
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 7 0 5 2 5
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.71 0.71 0.73 24 2987 12 3 6 3 10
3J3D_C 0.48 0.53 0.45 10 946 12 4 8 0 9
3J3E_8 0.10 0.13 0.09 2 2720 32 9 11 12 13
3J3E_7 0.61 0.56 0.68 19 2713 10 1 8 1 15
3J3F_8 0.35 0.42 0.30 8 4734 30 11 8 11 11
3J3F_7 0.25 0.25 0.26 9 2900 25 6 19 0 27
3J3V_B 0.19 0.19 0.22 5 2633 24 3 15 6 22
3UZL_B 0.66 0.69 0.65 11 1276 10 3 3 4 5
3W3S_B 0.74 0.70 0.79 23 1960 7 1 5 1 10
3ZEX_D 0.66 0.63 0.71 22 2765 10 4 5 1 13
3ZND_W 0.58 0.75 0.46 6 1178 17 4 3 10 2
4A1C_2 0.36 0.40 0.33 8 4492 28 4 12 12 12
4A1C_3 0.29 0.30 0.31 11 2727 26 4 21 1 26
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10
4JF2_A 0.74 0.67 0.84 16 1063 3 0 3 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.