CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) Vsfold5
MCC 0.876 > 0.481
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.842 ± 0.066 > 0.501 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.839 > 0.496
Positive Predictive Value 0.916 > 0.479
Total TP 460 > 272
Total TN 44423 > 44357
Total FP 135 < 363
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 87
Total FP INCONS 28 < 209
Total FP COMP 93 > 67
Total FN 88 < 276
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 460
Total TN 44423
Total FP 135
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 28
Total FP COMP 93
Total FN 88
Total Scores
MCC 0.876
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.842 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.839
Positive Predictive Value 0.916
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 0 5 0 12
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 2 0 0 2 0
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 5 0 0 5 2
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 4 3 0 1 1
3J3E_7 0.97 0.97 0.97 33 2707 6 0 1 5 1
3J3E_8 0.71 0.67 0.77 10 2729 8 1 2 5 5
3J3F_7 0.99 0.97 1.00 35 2899 4 0 0 4 1
3J3F_8 0.86 0.84 0.89 16 4743 13 2 0 11 3
3J3V_B 0.90 0.89 0.92 24 2630 14 0 2 12 3
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 8 0 0 8 2
3W3S_B 0.80 0.73 0.89 24 1962 6 1 2 3 9
3ZEX_D 0.96 0.94 0.97 33 2762 6 0 1 5 2
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 16 0 4 12 2
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 2 0 0 2 0
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7
4FRG_B 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 1180 3 0 2 1 4
4FRN_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 22 1823 3 2 1 0 6
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 272
Total TN 44357
Total FP 363
Total FP CONTRA 87
Total FP INCONS 209
Total FP COMP 67
Total FN 276
Total Scores
MCC 0.481
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.501 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.496
Positive Predictive Value 0.479
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3J20_0 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1198 6 3 2 1 5
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 7 0 5 2 5
3J2L_3 0.70 0.71 0.71 24 2986 13 3 7 3 10
3J3D_C 0.63 0.68 0.59 13 946 9 3 6 0 6
3J3E_7 0.60 0.59 0.63 20 2709 13 1 11 1 14
3J3E_8 0.10 0.13 0.08 2 2718 31 10 12 9 13
3J3F_7 0.25 0.25 0.26 9 2900 25 4 21 0 27
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.27 9 4728 38 13 11 14 10
3J3V_B 0.18 0.19 0.19 5 2629 28 7 15 6 22
3UZL_B 0.24 0.31 0.20 5 1268 20 9 11 0 11
3W3S_B 0.83 0.85 0.82 28 1955 7 2 4 1 5
3ZEX_D 0.09 0.09 0.12 3 2771 24 5 17 2 32
3ZND_W 0.58 0.75 0.46 6 1178 17 4 3 10 2
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.28 8 4487 37 8 13 16 12
4A1C_3 0.29 0.30 0.31 11 2727 26 4 21 1 26
4AOB_A 0.21 0.21 0.25 6 1413 19 2 16 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10
4FRN_A 0.15 0.14 0.17 4 1825 19 3 16 0 24
4JF2_A 0.96 1.00 0.92 24 1056 2 2 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.