CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & CentroidAlifold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) CentroidAlifold(seed)
MCC 0.793 > 0.667
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.114 > 0.622 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.752 > 0.480
Positive Predictive Value 0.841 < 0.934
Total TP 376 > 240
Total TN 43210 < 43400
Total FP 119 > 39
Total FP CONTRA 14 > 5
Total FP INCONS 57 > 12
Total FP COMP 48 > 22
Total FN 124 < 260
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and CentroidAlifold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and CentroidAlifold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 376
Total TN 43210
Total FP 119
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 57
Total FP COMP 48
Total FN 124
Total Scores
MCC 0.793
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.749 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.752
Positive Predictive Value 0.841
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.66 0.50 0.90 9 347 1 0 1 0 9
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 4 0 0 4 2
3J3D_C 0.87 0.89 0.85 17 948 3 3 0 0 2
3J3E_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2707 5 0 2 3 2
3J3E_8 0.21 0.20 0.23 3 2729 13 2 8 3 12
3J3F_8 0.37 0.37 0.37 7 4742 20 5 7 8 12
3J3F_7 0.93 0.92 0.94 33 2899 4 0 2 2 3
3RKF_A 0.86 0.79 0.95 19 846 1 0 1 0 5
3SD1_A 0.81 0.76 0.88 22 1508 3 2 1 0 7
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.31 0.47 9 5355 14 0 10 4 20
3ZEX_D 0.93 0.91 0.94 32 2762 6 0 2 4 3
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 2 0 2 0 3
4A1C_2 0.27 0.25 0.29 5 4499 16 1 11 4 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.63 0.47 0.88 7 464 1 0 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.64 0.53 0.80 8 486 2 0 2 0 7
4FRG_B 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 1183 1 0 1 0 6

^top



Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 240
Total TN 43400
Total FP 39
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 12
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 260
Total Scores
MCC 0.667
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.622 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.480
Positive Predictive Value 0.934
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.51 0.50 0.56 9 341 8 0 7 1 9
3AMU_B 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1152 1 0 0 1 14
3J20_1 0.54 0.30 1.00 6 1106 0 0 0 0 14
3J20_0 0.53 0.29 1.00 6 1213 0 0 0 0 15
3J2L_3 0.66 0.44 1.00 15 3005 2 0 0 2 19
3J3D_C 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 962 0 0 0 0 13
3J3E_7 0.68 0.50 0.94 17 2723 2 0 1 1 17
3J3E_8 0.39 0.20 0.75 3 2738 1 1 0 0 12
3J3F_8 0.62 0.47 0.82 9 4750 4 2 0 2 10
3J3F_7 0.68 0.47 1.00 17 2917 1 0 0 1 19
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
3ZEX_C 0.56 0.34 0.91 10 5363 3 1 0 2 19
3ZEX_D 0.65 0.43 1.00 15 2781 3 0 0 3 20
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1189 6 0 2 4 8
4A1C_3 0.66 0.43 1.00 16 2747 0 0 0 0 21
4A1C_2 0.60 0.40 0.89 8 4507 3 1 0 2 12
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 464 0 0 0 0 7
4ENC_A 0.73 0.53 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 7
4FRG_B 0.81 0.71 0.94 17 1184 2 0 1 1 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.