CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) ProbKnot
MCC 0.812 > 0.670
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.784 ± 0.124 > 0.673 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.753 > 0.686
Positive Predictive Value 0.880 > 0.662
Total TP 278 > 253
Total TN 28004 > 27938
Total FP 59 < 172
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 39
Total FP INCONS 34 < 90
Total FP COMP 21 < 43
Total FN 91 < 116
P-value 1.06761512825e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and ProbKnot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and ProbKnot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 278
Total TN 28004
Total FP 59
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 34
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 91
Total Scores
MCC 0.812
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.784 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.753
Positive Predictive Value 0.880
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.66 0.50 0.90 9 347 1 0 1 0 9
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 4 0 0 4 2
3RKF_A 0.86 0.79 0.95 19 846 1 0 1 0 5
3SD1_A 0.81 0.76 0.88 22 1508 3 2 1 0 7
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.31 0.47 9 5355 14 0 10 4 20
3ZEX_D 0.93 0.91 0.94 32 2762 6 0 2 4 3
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 2 0 2 0 3
4A1C_2 0.27 0.25 0.29 5 4499 16 1 11 4 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.63 0.47 0.88 7 464 1 0 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.64 0.53 0.80 8 486 2 0 2 0 7
4FRG_B 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 1183 1 0 1 0 6

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 253
Total TN 27938
Total FP 172
Total FP CONTRA 39
Total FP INCONS 90
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 116
Total Scores
MCC 0.670
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.673 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.686
Positive Predictive Value 0.662
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 9 0 5 4 4
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 8 0 5 3 5
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J2L_3 0.79 0.76 0.81 26 2988 11 0 6 5 8
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.48 0.52 0.45 15 5341 22 4 14 4 14
3ZEX_D 0.90 0.86 0.94 30 2764 7 0 2 5 5
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7
4FRG_B 0.38 0.38 0.41 9 1180 13 6 7 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.