CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) RDfolder
MCC 0.829 > 0.584
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.120 > 0.582 ± 0.242
Sensitivity 0.753 > 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.921 > 0.677
Total TP 128 > 88
Total TN 7398 < 7407
Total FP 15 < 47
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 9
Total FP INCONS 8 < 33
Total FP COMP 4 < 5
Total FN 42 < 82
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 128
Total TN 7398
Total FP 15
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 8
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 42
Total Scores
MCC 0.829
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.120
Sensitivity 0.753
Positive Predictive Value 0.921
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.66 0.50 0.90 9 347 1 0 1 0 9
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3RKF_A 0.86 0.79 0.95 19 846 1 0 1 0 5
3SD1_A 0.81 0.76 0.88 22 1508 3 2 1 0 7
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.63 0.47 0.88 7 464 1 0 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.64 0.53 0.80 8 486 2 0 2 0 7

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 88
Total TN 7407
Total FP 47
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 82
Total Scores
MCC 0.584
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.582 ± 0.242
Sensitivity 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.677
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.20 0.21 0.22 4 1139 16 4 10 2 15
3J20_0 0.82 0.76 0.89 16 1201 3 1 1 1 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.