CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & RNAshapes [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) RNAshapes
MCC 0.812 > 0.669
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.784 ± 0.124 > 0.678 ± 0.148
Sensitivity 0.753 > 0.678
Positive Predictive Value 0.880 > 0.668
Total TP 278 > 250
Total TN 28004 > 27946
Total FP 59 < 173
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 30
Total FP INCONS 34 < 94
Total FP COMP 21 < 49
Total FN 91 < 119
P-value 2.39162260866e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and RNAshapes. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RNAshapes).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RNAshapes).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and RNAshapes. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RNAshapes).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 278
Total TN 28004
Total FP 59
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 34
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 91
Total Scores
MCC 0.812
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.784 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.753
Positive Predictive Value 0.880
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.66 0.50 0.90 9 347 1 0 1 0 9
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J2L_3 0.97 0.94 1.00 32 2988 4 0 0 4 2
3RKF_A 0.86 0.79 0.95 19 846 1 0 1 0 5
3SD1_A 0.81 0.76 0.88 22 1508 3 2 1 0 7
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.31 0.47 9 5355 14 0 10 4 20
3ZEX_D 0.93 0.91 0.94 32 2762 6 0 2 4 3
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 2 0 2 0 3
4A1C_2 0.27 0.25 0.29 5 4499 16 1 11 4 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.63 0.47 0.88 7 464 1 0 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.64 0.53 0.80 8 486 2 0 2 0 7
4FRG_B 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 1183 1 0 1 0 6

^top



Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 250
Total TN 27946
Total FP 173
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 94
Total FP COMP 49
Total FN 119
Total Scores
MCC 0.669
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.678 ± 0.148
Sensitivity 0.678
Positive Predictive Value 0.668
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J2L_3 0.77 0.79 0.75 27 2984 14 1 8 5 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3ZEX_C 0.29 0.34 0.26 10 5335 42 5 24 13 19
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.80 0.93 28 2766 6 0 2 4 7
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 7 0 4 3 6
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 41 11 16 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.