CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.117 > 0.115
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.061 ± 0.091 > 0.039 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.030 > 0.013
Positive Predictive Value 0.474 < 1.000
Total TP 9 > 4
Total TN 23005 < 23020
Total FP 49 > 0
Total FP CONTRA 0 = 0
Total FP INCONS 10 > 0
Total FP COMP 39 > 0
Total FN 292 < 297
P-value 0.000163025247502

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Carnac(seed)).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 9
Total TN 23005
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 10
Total FP COMP 39
Total FN 292
Total Scores
MCC 0.117
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.061 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.030
Positive Predictive Value 0.474
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.33 0.75 6 520 2 0 2 0 12
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1989 0 0 0 0 33
3ZEX_C 0.15 0.07 0.33 2 5368 24 0 4 20 27
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1848 0 0 0 0 28

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 4
Total TN 23020
Total FP 0
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 297
Total Scores
MCC 0.115
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.039 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.013
Positive Predictive Value 1.000
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.22 1.00 4 524 0 0 0 0 14
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1989 0 0 0 0 33
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5374 0 0 0 0 29
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1848 0 0 0 0 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.