CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Pknots & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Pknots Cylofold
MCC 0.741 > 0.729
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.751 ± 0.073 > 0.747 ± 0.062
Sensitivity 0.754 > 0.710
Positive Predictive Value 0.737 < 0.758
Total TP 1000 > 942
Total TN 72958 < 73072
Total FP 462 > 395
Total FP CONTRA 95 > 85
Total FP INCONS 262 > 216
Total FP COMP 105 > 94
Total FN 327 < 385
P-value 6.70530687003e-06

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Pknots and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of performance of Pknots and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and Cylofold).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and Cylofold).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and Cylofold).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Pknots and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and Cylofold).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Pknots and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1000
Total TN 72958
Total FP 462
Total FP CONTRA 95
Total FP INCONS 262
Total FP COMP 105
Total FN 327
Total Scores
MCC 0.741
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.751 ± 0.073
Sensitivity 0.754
Positive Predictive Value 0.737
Nr of predictions 73

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.79 0.83 0.76 19 1999 13 5 1 7 4
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 144 5 0 5 0 8
2KZL_A - 0.66 0.69 0.64 9 506 6 2 3 1 4
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 0 0 0 0 0
2L3C_B - 0.96 0.93 1.00 13 226 0 0 0 0 1
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A 0.83 0.83 0.83 15 510 3 2 1 0 3
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.48 0.55 0.43 16 2403 23 9 12 2 13
2LWK_A - 0.38 0.27 0.60 3 202 3 0 2 1 8
2RRC_A - 0.92 0.86 1.00 6 69 0 0 0 0 1
2XKV_B 0.21 0.27 0.17 3 1817 33 3 12 18 8
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.32 0.34 0.32 12 2008 26 1 24 1 23
2Y9C_V - 0.70 0.67 0.75 12 890 6 0 4 2 6
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 6 1 3 2 3
3ADB_C - 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1787 0 0 0 0 1
3AKZ_H 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1107 2 0 0 2 0
3AM1_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 29 1437 0 0 0 0 0
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 3 0 0 3 0
3IZF_C 0.89 0.91 0.86 32 2603 9 0 5 4 3
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 171 5 3 2 0 2
3J0L_7 - 0.38 0.50 0.31 5 503 12 3 8 1 5
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.36 0.36 4 400 8 3 4 1 7
3J0L_2 - 0.44 0.46 0.43 12 2222 23 1 15 7 14
3J0L_h - 0.67 0.66 0.70 21 2110 11 4 5 2 11
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J16_L 0.41 0.43 0.41 9 1137 13 1 12 0 12
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.79 0.79 0.79 27 2986 12 1 6 5 7
3NDB_M - 0.92 0.93 0.91 41 3669 8 3 1 4 3
3NKB_B - 0.64 0.68 0.62 13 714 8 0 8 0 6
3NMU_E - 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 213 5 0 0 5 0
3O58_3 0.32 0.45 0.24 10 4722 39 18 14 7 12
3O58_2 0.93 0.90 0.97 28 2725 3 0 1 2 3
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 0 0 0 0 0
3PDR_A 0.64 0.64 0.65 32 4791 19 4 13 2 18
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3R9X_C - 0.87 0.88 0.88 7 221 5 0 1 4 1
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.78 0.76 0.81 22 1506 5 1 4 0 7
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.33 0.36 0.32 8 1251 17 4 13 0 14
3UZL_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 1277 7 0 0 7 0
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.78 0.76 0.81 25 1958 7 1 5 1 8
3ZEX_D 0.31 0.34 0.30 12 2756 28 5 23 0 23
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.19 0.21 0.21 6 1409 23 3 19 1 23
4ATO_G - 0.36 0.43 0.33 3 211 6 6 0 0 4
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 2 0 0 2 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FNJ_A - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 240 10 0 10 0 12
4FRG_B 0.55 0.50 0.63 12 1183 7 0 7 0 12
4FRN_A 0.57 0.54 0.63 15 1824 9 3 6 0 13
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 942
Total TN 73072
Total FP 395
Total FP CONTRA 85
Total FP INCONS 216
Total FP COMP 94
Total FN 385
Total Scores
MCC 0.729
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.062
Sensitivity 0.710
Positive Predictive Value 0.758
Nr of predictions 73

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.85 0.87 0.83 20 2000 12 4 0 8 3
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.63 1.00 5 144 0 0 0 0 3
2KZL_A - 0.83 0.69 1.00 9 511 1 0 0 1 4
2L1F_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 743 0 0 0 0 3
2L1F_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 770 0 0 0 0 3
2L2K_A - 0.87 0.76 1.00 13 336 0 0 0 0 4
2L3C_B - 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 229 0 0 0 0 4
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 958 0 0 0 0 3
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
2LDL_A - 0.81 0.67 1.00 6 134 0 0 0 0 3
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.56 0.55 0.57 16 2412 13 4 8 1 13
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2XKV_B 0.41 0.55 0.32 6 1816 25 9 4 12 5
2XQD_Y 0.89 0.95 0.83 20 1105 5 4 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.11 4 2009 32 2 30 0 31
2Y9C_V - 0.72 0.72 0.72 13 888 8 0 5 3 5
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 591 11 5 6 0 8
2YIE_X - 0.43 0.57 0.33 4 532 10 2 6 2 3
3ADB_C - 0.84 0.82 0.87 27 1788 4 0 4 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.77 0.75 0.79 15 1108 7 0 4 3 5
3AM1_B - 0.83 0.76 0.92 22 1442 2 0 2 0 7
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 7 0 4 3 6
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_7 - 0.41 0.50 0.36 5 505 10 3 6 1 5
3J0L_a - 0.17 0.18 0.20 2 401 9 3 5 1 9
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.46 0.52 12 2227 18 0 11 7 14
3J0L_h - 0.55 0.50 0.62 16 2114 10 2 8 0 16
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3J20_1 0.71 0.75 0.68 15 1090 8 2 5 1 5
3J2L_3 0.71 0.68 0.74 23 2989 11 0 8 3 11
3NDB_M - 0.68 0.64 0.74 28 3676 14 2 8 4 16
3NKB_B - 0.46 0.42 0.53 8 720 7 0 7 0 11
3NMU_E - 0.28 0.33 0.25 1 212 6 1 2 3 2
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3O58_2 0.90 0.84 0.96 26 2727 3 0 1 2 5
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 0 0 0 0 0
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.63 0.42 1.00 5 149 0 0 0 0 7
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.45 0.50 0.42 8 1274 18 4 7 7 8
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.48 0.45 0.52 15 1960 15 1 13 1 18
3ZEX_D 0.69 0.69 0.71 24 2762 11 5 5 1 11
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ATO_G - 0.88 1.00 0.78 7 211 2 2 0 0 0
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FNJ_A - 0.81 0.67 1.00 8 242 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3
4FRN_A 0.23 0.18 0.31 5 1832 11 7 4 0 23
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.