CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Pknots & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Pknots RNAwolf
MCC 0.602 > 0.513
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.656 ± 0.085 > 0.559 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.636 > 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.581 > 0.523
Total TP 725 > 588
Total TN 80920 < 81042
Total FP 660 < 676
Total FP CONTRA 151 > 138
Total FP INCONS 371 < 399
Total FP COMP 138 < 139
Total FN 415 < 552
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Pknots and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Pknots and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 725
Total TN 80920
Total FP 660
Total FP CONTRA 151
Total FP INCONS 371
Total FP COMP 138
Total FN 415
Total Scores
MCC 0.602
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.656 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.636
Positive Predictive Value 0.581
Nr of predictions 64

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.83 0.83 0.83 15 510 3 2 1 0 3
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.48 0.55 0.43 16 2403 23 9 12 2 13
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LU0_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 422 0 0 0 0 0
2LWK_A - 0.38 0.27 0.60 3 202 3 0 2 1 8
2M58_A - 0.60 0.58 0.64 7 533 4 1 3 0 5
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 6 1 3 2 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 3 0 0 3 0
3J0L_2 - 0.44 0.46 0.43 12 2222 23 1 15 7 14
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.36 0.36 4 400 8 3 4 1 7
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_h - 0.67 0.66 0.70 21 2110 11 4 5 2 11
3J0L_7 - 0.38 0.50 0.31 5 503 12 3 8 1 5
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 171 5 3 2 0 2
3J16_L 0.41 0.43 0.41 9 1137 13 1 12 0 12
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.79 0.79 0.79 27 2986 12 1 6 5 7
3J3D_C 0.46 0.53 0.42 10 944 14 5 9 0 9
3J3E_7 0.56 0.56 0.58 19 2708 16 2 12 2 15
3J3E_8 0.10 0.13 0.09 2 2720 33 5 15 13 13
3J3F_7 0.32 0.33 0.32 12 2896 27 2 24 1 24
3J3F_8 0.42 0.53 0.33 10 4731 37 10 10 17 9
3J3V_B 0.58 0.63 0.55 17 2625 20 3 11 6 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.78 0.76 0.81 22 1506 5 1 4 0 7
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.33 0.36 0.32 8 1251 17 4 13 0 14
3UZL_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 1277 7 0 0 7 0
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.78 0.76 0.81 25 1958 7 1 5 1 8
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 12 0 4 8 4
3ZEX_C 0.10 0.14 0.08 4 5322 54 13 35 6 25
3ZEX_G - 0.45 0.49 0.42 22 6455 39 9 21 9 23
3ZEX_H - 0.26 0.37 0.19 7 3588 33 14 16 3 12
3ZEX_D 0.31 0.34 0.30 12 2756 28 5 23 0 23
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 25 9 7 9 5
4A1C_3 0.28 0.30 0.28 11 2723 30 4 25 1 26
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.29 8 4488 36 9 11 16 12
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.19 0.21 0.21 6 1409 23 3 19 1 23
4ATO_G - 0.36 0.43 0.33 3 211 6 6 0 0 4
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 2 0 0 2 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FNJ_A - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 240 10 0 10 0 12
4FRG_B 0.55 0.50 0.63 12 1183 7 0 7 0 12
4FRN_A 0.57 0.54 0.63 15 1824 9 3 6 0 13
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.92 1.00 0.86 24 1054 4 4 0 0 0
4JRC_A - 0.94 0.94 0.94 16 605 1 1 0 0 1

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 588
Total TN 81042
Total FP 676
Total FP CONTRA 138
Total FP INCONS 399
Total FP COMP 139
Total FN 552
Total Scores
MCC 0.513
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.559 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.523
Nr of predictions 64

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
2LDL_A - 0.88 0.78 1.00 7 133 0 0 0 0 2
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 1 0 0 1 0
2LI4_A - 0.96 0.93 1.00 13 176 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.79 0.88 23 2414 11 0 3 8 6
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 1 0 0 1 0
2LU0_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 423 0 0 0 0 1
2LWK_A - 0.48 0.45 0.56 5 198 5 0 4 1 6
2M58_A - 0.60 0.58 0.64 7 533 4 1 3 0 5
2YIE_X - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 536 11 1 7 3 7
2YIE_Z - 0.62 0.63 0.63 5 594 7 1 2 4 3
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J0L_2 - 0.14 0.15 0.15 4 2223 26 4 19 3 22
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.14 2 397 13 4 8 1 9
3J0L_1 - 0.68 0.54 0.88 7 476 5 0 1 4 6
3J0L_h - 0.47 0.41 0.57 13 2117 12 1 9 2 19
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 509 10 1 9 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 171 7 4 1 2 2
3J16_L 0.58 0.57 0.60 12 1139 9 2 6 1 9
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 2 9 1 9
3J20_1 0.53 0.55 0.52 11 1091 11 4 6 1 9
3J2L_3 0.71 0.71 0.73 24 2987 13 1 8 4 10
3J3D_C 0.92 0.95 0.90 18 948 3 2 0 1 1
3J3E_7 0.57 0.56 0.59 19 2709 15 1 12 2 15
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 37 6 17 14 15
3J3F_7 0.27 0.28 0.28 10 2898 27 4 22 1 26
3J3F_8 0.28 0.37 0.23 7 4730 39 9 15 15 12
3J3V_B 0.59 0.59 0.59 16 2629 16 1 10 5 11
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 142 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 103 6 0 5 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.50 0.50 0.52 11 1255 12 1 9 2 11
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 1 0 0 1 0
3W1K_J 0.81 0.77 0.86 24 1650 5 0 4 1 7
3W3S_B 0.70 0.70 0.72 23 1957 10 0 9 1 10
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 17 0 4 13 4
3ZEX_C 0.08 0.10 0.07 3 5328 43 18 25 0 26
3ZEX_G - 0.20 0.20 0.21 9 6465 37 13 20 4 36
3ZEX_H - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3593 33 17 15 1 19
3ZEX_D 0.26 0.26 0.27 9 2763 24 8 16 0 26
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_3 0.32 0.30 0.35 11 2732 21 1 19 1 26
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ATO_G - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 213 7 4 3 0 7
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10
4FNJ_A - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 243 7 0 7 0 12
4FRG_B 0.54 0.50 0.60 12 1182 8 3 5 0 12
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1828 20 1 19 0 28
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.72 0.67 0.80 16 1062 4 4 0 0 8
4JRC_A - 0.71 0.65 0.79 11 608 3 2 1 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.