CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	PknotsRG		NanoFolder
MCC	0.701	>	0.394
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.790 ± 0.111	>	0.582 ± 0.147
Sensitivity	0.725	>	0.485
Positive Predictive Value	0.685	>	0.334
Total TP	366	>	245
Total TN	40695	>	40496
Total FP	221	<	536
Total FP CONTRA	57	<	162
Total FP INCONS	111	<	326
Total FP COMP	53	>	48
Total FN	139	<	260
P-value	5.19332990918e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of PknotsRG and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and NanoFolder).
Comparison of performance of PknotsRG and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and NanoFolder).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and NanoFolder).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and NanoFolder).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PknotsRG and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and NanoFolder).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PknotsRG and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and NanoFolder).

^top

Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	366
Total TN	40695
Total FP	221
Total FP CONTRA	57
Total FP INCONS	111
Total FP COMP	53
Total FN	139

Total Scores
MCC	0.701
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.790 ± 0.111
Sensitivity	0.725
Positive Predictive Value	0.685
Nr of predictions	25

^top

2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.61	0.73	11	513	4	2	2	0	7
2LDL_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	131	1	0	0	1	0
2LI4_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	175	0	0	0	0	0
2LK3_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	91	0	0	0	0	0
2LKR_A	-	0.81	0.86	0.76	25	2407	10	6	2	2	4
2LQZ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	124	2	0	0	2	0
2LWK_A	-	0.95	0.91	1.00	10	197	1	0	0	1	1
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.90	0.81	1.00	17	1142	0	0	0	0	4
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	20	1092	1	0	0	1	0
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.80	0.82	0.78	28	2984	12	1	7	4	6
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.92	1.00	11	143	0	0	0	0	1
3U4M_B	-	0.49	0.55	0.46	12	1250	14	3	11	0	10
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.49	0.50	0.50	8	1277	15	0	8	7	8
3VJR_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	239	0	0	0	0	0
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.64	0.66	21	1957	12	4	7	1	12
3ZEX_G	-	0.70	0.71	0.70	32	6461	23	6	8	9	13
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.88	0.83	0.94	29	2765	6	0	2	4	6
3ZEX_E	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	8254	55	17	33	5	34
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.18	0.25	0.14	5	4480	43	11	20	12	15
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.84	0.86	31	2727	8	0	5	3	6
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	96	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.60	0.59	0.63	17	1410	11	4	6	1	12
4ATO_G	-	0.88	1.00	0.78	7	211	2	2	0	0	0
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.97	1.00	0.94	15	480	1	1	0	0	0
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	89	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	245
Total TN	40496
Total FP	536
Total FP CONTRA	162
Total FP INCONS	326
Total FP COMP	48
Total FN	260

Total Scores
MCC	0.394
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.582 ± 0.147
Sensitivity	0.485
Positive Predictive Value	0.334
Nr of predictions	25

^top

2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.54	0.61	0.50	11	506	11	1	10	0	7
2LDL_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	131	1	0	0	1	0
2LI4_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	175	0	0	0	0	0
2LK3_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	91	0	0	0	0	0
2LKR_A	-	0.26	0.34	0.21	10	2392	41	15	23	3	19
2LQZ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	124	3	0	0	3	0
2LWK_A	-	0.95	0.91	1.00	10	197	2	0	0	2	1
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.43	0.52	0.37	11	1129	19	8	11	0	10
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.50	0.37	10	1085	20	5	12	3	10
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.13	0.18	0.12	6	2969	46	14	31	1	28
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.92	1.00	11	143	0	0	0	0	1
3U4M_B	-	0.77	0.91	0.67	20	1246	12	6	4	2	2
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.56	0.31	9	1264	25	10	10	5	7
3VJR_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	239	0	0	0	0	0
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.18	0.21	0.18	7	1949	34	2	31	1	26
3ZEX_G	-	0.04	0.07	0.04	3	6431	77	18	55	4	42
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.30	0.37	0.27	13	2747	36	10	26	0	22
3ZEX_E	-	0.03	0.06	0.02	2	8222	86	31	49	6	32
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	4469	61	18	29	14	20
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.68	0.51	25	2714	24	9	15	0	12
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	96	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.39	0.41	0.39	12	1406	20	4	15	1	17
4ATO_G	-	0.72	1.00	0.54	7	207	6	6	0	0	0
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.73	0.61	11	478	9	2	5	2	4
4HXH_A	-	0.80	1.00	0.67	6	86	3	3	0	0	0

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]