CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PknotsRG & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PknotsRG TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.662 > 0.647
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.707 ± 0.187 > 0.639 ± 0.205
Sensitivity 0.683 > 0.615
Positive Predictive Value 0.651 < 0.691
Total TP 179 > 161
Total TN 19915 < 19957
Total FP 129 > 92
Total FP CONTRA 29 > 20
Total FP INCONS 67 > 52
Total FP COMP 33 > 20
Total FN 83 < 101
P-value 1.39027542218e-05

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PknotsRG and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PknotsRG and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 179
Total TN 19915
Total FP 129
Total FP CONTRA 29
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 83
Total Scores
MCC 0.662
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.707 ± 0.187
Sensitivity 0.683
Positive Predictive Value 0.651
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.66 0.61 0.73 11 513 4 2 2 0 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.26 10 5336 44 5 23 16 19
4A1C_3 0.85 0.84 0.86 31 2727 8 0 5 3 6
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 43 11 20 12 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRN_A 0.59 0.57 0.62 16 1822 10 2 8 0 12

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 161
Total TN 19957
Total FP 92
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 52
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 101
Total Scores
MCC 0.647
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.639 ± 0.205
Sensitivity 0.615
Positive Predictive Value 0.691
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.45 0.54 13 5350 15 2 9 4 16
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRN_A 0.79 0.71 0.87 20 1825 3 1 2 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.