CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & Murlet(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot Murlet(20)
MCC 0.679 > 0.667
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.685 ± 0.098 > 0.656 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.700 > 0.567
Positive Predictive Value 0.664 < 0.792
Total TP 494 > 400
Total TN 75397 < 75636
Total FP 353 > 148
Total FP CONTRA 72 > 21
Total FP INCONS 178 > 84
Total FP COMP 103 > 43
Total FN 212 < 306
P-value 5.6410608252e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and Murlet(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Murlet(20)).

  2. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and Murlet(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Murlet(20)).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Murlet(20)).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Murlet(20)).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and Murlet(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Murlet(20)).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and Murlet(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Murlet(20)).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 494
Total TN 75397
Total FP 353
Total FP CONTRA 72
Total FP INCONS 178
Total FP COMP 103
Total FN 212
Total Scores
MCC 0.679
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.685 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.700
Positive Predictive Value 0.664
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 26 0 6 20 3
2XQD_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1108 2 0 0 2 0
2XXA_G 0.25 0.26 0.26 9 2011 26 1 24 1 26
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 9 0 5 4 4
3IZ4_A 0.59 0.61 0.57 58 25435 49 17 26 6 37
3IZF_C 0.90 0.91 0.89 32 2604 7 0 4 3 3
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 8 0 5 3 5
3J2L_3 0.79 0.76 0.81 26 2988 11 0 6 5 8
3NPB_A 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2247 9 0 4 5 10
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3O58_2 0.91 0.94 0.88 29 2721 10 0 4 6 2
3PDR_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 46 4786 10 5 3 2 4
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.48 0.52 0.45 15 5341 22 4 14 4 14
3ZEX_D 0.90 0.86 0.94 30 2764 7 0 2 5 5
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7
4FRG_B 0.38 0.38 0.41 9 1180 13 6 7 0 15

^top



Performance of Murlet(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 400
Total TN 75636
Total FP 148
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 84
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 306
Total Scores
MCC 0.667
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.656 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.567
Positive Predictive Value 0.792
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.51 0.50 0.56 9 341 8 0 7 1 9
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 3 0 0 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.86 0.90 18 1109 3 0 2 1 3
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 0 0 0 0 28
3AMU_B 0.89 0.89 0.89 17 1138 4 0 2 2 2
3IZ4_A 0.46 0.33 0.66 31 25489 22 3 13 6 64
3IZF_C 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2609 5 0 2 3 6
3J20_0 0.65 0.62 0.68 13 1200 6 1 5 0 8
3J20_1 0.69 0.60 0.80 12 1097 4 0 3 1 8
3J2L_3 0.84 0.74 0.96 25 2994 4 0 1 3 9
3NPB_A 0.65 0.43 1.00 16 2262 2 0 0 2 21
3O58_3 0.37 0.32 0.44 7 4748 13 4 5 4 15
3O58_2 1.00 1.00 1.00 31 2723 2 0 0 2 0
3PDR_A 0.84 0.76 0.93 38 4799 3 1 2 0 12
3RKF_A 0.81 0.67 1.00 16 850 0 0 0 0 8
3SD1_A 0.82 0.83 0.83 24 1504 5 4 1 0 5
3ZEX_C 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 5351 16 2 10 4 18
3ZEX_D 0.90 0.86 0.94 30 2764 5 0 2 3 5
4A1C_3 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 2738 4 0 3 1 15
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.20 5 4491 24 5 15 4 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 22 1415 3 0 0 3 7
4ENB_A 0.51 0.27 1.00 4 468 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.19 0.17 0.25 4 1186 12 1 11 0 20

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.