CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.641 > 0.094
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.625 ± 0.130 > 0.039 ± 0.056
Sensitivity 0.655 > 0.019
Positive Predictive Value 0.638 > 0.474
Total TP 306 > 9
Total TN 34300 < 34761
Total FP 225 > 49
Total FP CONTRA 54 > 0
Total FP INCONS 120 > 10
Total FP COMP 51 > 39
Total FN 161 < 458
P-value 1.79203144115e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and PPfold(seed)).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and PPfold(seed)).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and PPfold(seed)).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 306
Total TN 34300
Total FP 225
Total FP CONTRA 54
Total FP INCONS 120
Total FP COMP 51
Total FN 161
Total Scores
MCC 0.641
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.625 ± 0.130
Sensitivity 0.655
Positive Predictive Value 0.638
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 9 0 5 4 4
3J16_L 0.42 0.48 0.38 10 1133 16 3 13 0 11
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 8 0 5 3 5
3J2L_3 0.79 0.76 0.81 26 2988 11 0 6 5 8
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3UZL_B 0.92 1.00 0.84 16 1274 11 3 0 8 0
3W3S_B 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1957 1 0 0 1 1
3ZEX_C 0.48 0.52 0.45 15 5341 22 4 14 4 14
3ZEX_D 0.90 0.86 0.94 30 2764 7 0 2 5 5
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7
4FRG_B 0.38 0.38 0.41 9 1180 13 6 7 0 15
4FRN_A 0.49 0.46 0.54 13 1824 11 6 5 0 15

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 9
Total TN 34761
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 10
Total FP COMP 39
Total FN 458
Total Scores
MCC 0.094
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.039 ± 0.056
Sensitivity 0.019
Positive Predictive Value 0.474
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.33 0.75 6 520 2 0 2 0 12
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1157 0 0 0 0 19
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1159 0 0 0 0 21
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1219 0 0 0 0 21
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1112 0 0 0 0 20
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3020 0 0 0 0 34
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1293 0 0 0 0 16
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1989 0 0 0 0 33
3ZEX_C 0.15 0.07 0.33 2 5368 24 0 4 20 27
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2796 0 0 0 0 35
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1848 0 0 0 0 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.