CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.650 > 0.604
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.651 ± 0.274 > 0.590 ± 0.201
Sensitivity 0.700 > 0.496
Positive Predictive Value 0.611 < 0.744
Total TP 168 > 119
Total TN 21206 < 21321
Total FP 143 > 61
Total FP CONTRA 38 > 11
Total FP INCONS 69 > 30
Total FP COMP 36 > 20
Total FN 72 < 121
P-value 3.05332335737e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 168
Total TN 21206
Total FP 143
Total FP CONTRA 38
Total FP INCONS 69
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 72
Total Scores
MCC 0.650
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.651 ± 0.274
Sensitivity 0.700
Positive Predictive Value 0.611
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3W3S_B 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1957 1 0 0 1 1
3ZEX_C 0.48 0.52 0.45 15 5341 22 4 14 4 14
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 119
Total TN 21321
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 30
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 121
Total Scores
MCC 0.604
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.590 ± 0.201
Sensitivity 0.496
Positive Predictive Value 0.744
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L1F_B 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 774 0 0 0 0 7
2L1F_A 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 747 0 0 0 0 7
2L94_A 0.70 0.56 0.91 10 346 2 0 1 1 8
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 10 0 10 0 18
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 13 5 3 5 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3W3S_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 12 1977 1 0 0 1 21
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 14 2 7 5 20
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.